FansOfAll
loopop
loopop

patreon


Roland FANTOM Version 2 Review and multi-sampling tutorial

Hi!

Roland just released a fairly significant update to their Zen-core based Fantom 6/7/8 product line, adding much-needed sample playback and multi-sampling features, as well as quite a few other updates.

"Workstation" seems like such a stodgy term compared to the less formal "groovebox" label, but when you take a closer look, it looks like the two are increasingly converging.

Synth and sample playback engines, step and live sequencing, patterns, Ableton Live style grids, chains and songs - all familiar terms and all increasingly appearing across the product ranges.

A big difference remains - a keyboard or performance-oriented workflow and interface of "workstations", compared to a pad-based workflow of "production centers".

The player and keyboard performance aspect of Fantom is also clear - while sampling capabilities have finally been added, the sampling workflow is still slow compared to the sample-oriented MPC or Maschine.

That said, if you're a keyboard player on your own or in a band and are interested in as many as possible sounds in one package with extended polyphony for multitrack sequencing, or interested in "dawless" production using a piano keyboard interface, Fantom is well worth a look.

That's it for this busy week - have a great weekend!

Ziv (promising no more 40+ minute review/tutorials this week on "Loopop"...)

Roland FANTOM Version 2 Review and multi-sampling tutorial

Comments

hmmm like I mentioned I believe I cover the workflow of instruments (how to do things and what it's like to live with it) quite in depth. but indeed how people actually use them is very individual IMHO

I believe that the reasons why no one has tackled it is because everyone believes it is a very personal thing. And yet everyone talks about it. It's quite surprising when I see a piece about a new bit of kit that doesn't. I mean, has that ever happened? Workflow is such a massive part of music making. It is such a massive part of the thought process behind producing an electronic instrument and yet no one has ever sat down and talked about it.

I don't think a definitive one can be released, maybe one per genre... and even that I think would be individual to the producer. but I'll give it some thought...

Music making in general, yes. Your observations on this instruments' workflow is behind my comment. There are many ways to build a house, agreed. There are also many skills that are brought to bear during that process, but still. In my opinion, understanding workflow is a vital piece of the puzzle and yet it is very rarely tackled by any YouTube channel and a definitive view has yet to be released.

Are you referring to music making in general or this particular instrument? Producers/musicians can have a workflow, and that's different per individual and genre. What I try to cover is an instrument's workflow - how to sample, how to sequence, how to perform with it.

I would love to see a series, not just a single piece, on workflow. What are the constituent parts? What is a flow? What isn't? What helps or hinders? I'm sure there are many people who believe that it is simply a matter of personal preference. You could say that about any activity that allows you to choose a path to the finished product. We all talk about workflow. The videos that cover it make it clear that it's not easy to explain it.


More Creators