PATREON EXCLUSIVE (Full Video): Women don't respect men's bodily autonomy
Added 2025-01-15 04:48:07 +0000 UTC
Comments
Solipsism in women is the very reason why men should have all authority with society. The more so called rights women get the more society will go down the pan. It's the very reason why men are disrespected and also women don't care if society collapses they can't see passed their own experiences and they will continue to demand more and more for themselves. We really should never have even let them out of the kitchen. It's been nothing but disastrous consequences...
Mikey Lavery
2025-01-22 00:57:46 +0000 UTCThe Feminist ideology (whether manifested as "De Jure", as in the West, or "De Facto", as in the East) has led to a very OVERTLY transactional relationship between men and women, with the latter motivated by Hypergamous expectations of status, education and wealth (like "Bride Prices" in China) and the former understandably driven to "Prenups", "Paternity Tests" and now pre-marital "Checkups" (called "GPAs" in China - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVQf4Jy8PSs) in keeping with their own "Hypergamous" expectations for purity, youth and fertility.
Joseph Omega
2025-01-21 00:00:50 +0000 UTC@Dave Smith - From what I understand, in such places as Iran and Qatar, aberrant behavior of BOTH males AND females run the very real risk of CATASTROPHIC consequences for public deviation from expected behavior, and the risk hidden away behind PRIVATE domestic walls may be even MORE severe, ESPECIALLY for a woman. Then, from what I understand, in other places, like India and Pakistan, "Sati" and "honor killings" continue to be occasionally practiced. Personally, I would not be all that enthusiatic about the prospect of emigrating to such places, regardless of the degree to which they may be considered "male run".
Joseph Omega
2025-01-18 20:39:18 +0000 UTC@Dave Smith - I agree with your general assessment, with the caveat that I don't believe the actual RACE of the female protagonist mattered (note the race of the seated woman who objected to the treatment) -- blue collar "Black" men are generally considered to be LEAST on the hierarchy of social significance and disposability, so his treatment would have tended to have been the same regardless of his accuser. Of significant note however, is the IRONY that it did not seem to have even OCCURED to this seated (presumably NOT pregnant) "White" woman herself who complained, to offer her seat to this pregnant (ostensibly) "Black" woman, with the LATTER not even seeming to think THAT unacceptable either -- the implicit "pecking order" in many "Western" societies (as in many OTHER places around the world, I'm sure) is very well established and understood. Still, I wonder how you would have categorized the societies of 100, 200, 300 years ago at the heights of their eras of CHIVALRY, where it was said that such acts of "dishonor" by a male could EASILY have been grounds for public chastisement and ridicule (and even resulted in a possible "Duel to the Death") in protection of this woman's "honor". Would you consider THOSE societies "woman run" back even then?
Joseph Omega
2025-01-18 20:21:29 +0000 UTC@Dave Smith - Though I agree with much of what you say, it seems a bit difficult to support the contention that "women are less intelligent than men and more compliant" given the fact of Feminism's AMAZING success, and the "Patriarchy's" near complete captitulation to its demands.
Joseph Omega
2025-01-18 07:45:07 +0000 UTC@Dave Smith - Your videos are VERY enlightening (and some CERTAINLY very entertaining) -- I AM familiar with the "Leftover Women" and "Lying Flat" phenomena in China, but also the "4-D" movement in South Korea, and the "Herbivore Men" and "Carnivore Women" phenomena in Japan. Although I think I can sort of begin to get an idea as to what you may be getting at with your concepts of "women run" and "men run" societies, I have a different take, based on what I refer to as "De Facto" Feminism (in the East) versus "De Jure" Feminism (in the West): https://chatgpt.com/share/671e959b-d71c-800a-b6d3-f1bca633e9c7 Here is a couple summary excerpts from this exchange I once had with ChatGPT that may illustrate my points: "It’s not just that economic development correlates with lower birth rates; it’s that the specific way economic efficiency is pursued—through the 'cogs-in-the-machine' model—that actively discourages family life. This approach can lead to a society that, while economically successful, suffers from a loss of deeper cultural and spiritual values that traditionally encouraged larger families. This mechanistic treatment, regardless of whether the system is capitalist, socialist, or otherwise, is the critical driver that reduces birth rates—not the economic prosperity itself but the cost at which it's achieved, including the erosion of family-friendly values." "In addition, the spiritual and ideological treatment of gender—whether in a secular or religious context—plays a crucial role in shaping demographic outcomes. If a religion promotes an egalitarian, gender-neutral perspective, communities influenced by that belief are likely to experience similar demographic shifts as secular 'cogs-in-the-machine' societies, leading to lower birth rates. This reinforces the idea that how a society perceives and treats gender—whether through ideology, religion, or economic structure—can significantly impact fertility trends." "So it is not just secular ideologies but also modernized and Western-influenced religious movements that are more likely to adopt gender-neutral or egalitarian frameworks, leading to lower birth rates. In contrast, traditional religions [like Islam] and societies that maintain distinct roles for men and women are more resilient to these demographic shifts, as they continue to emphasize the spiritual and social importance of family and gender complementarity." So in essence, what I'm proposing sort of mirrors your identification of "women run" cultures, but in terms of the Feminist Contagion that is spreading worldwide, and that with the ubiquity of globalized social media, there really are FEW cultures (notably in the Middle East and Africa) that retain ANY real vestage of being "men run". My hypothesis is an extension of the "Hope Crisis" theory postulated by Malcom and Simone Collins (who Alexander interviewed last year): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tauryUSa4lk
Joseph Omega
2025-01-18 07:34:57 +0000 UTCfor china, watch this first: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/31BwYVN0K8Q then watch some stuff on this channel (scamming is huge in female-run soceities) as well as legal battles (women are lawyers as court is a woman’s domaind, constant arguing + manipulating): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W43WnnkA0XQ
Dave Smith
2025-01-18 02:55:41 +0000 UTCBlack women are not assholes everywhere, but they are in america. Is like a 95% single mother rate and their attitude/behaviour reflects that. In female-run societies and groups the men are ‘expected’ to be subservient. So as she is black and she’s accustomed to subservient (and also insane is the split in female-run cultures, which is the alpha beta split amplified) she then sees a man who is working and black, so categorises him as beta and expects total subserviance. A chinese woman would do it to a Chinese man, Australian woman to Australian man (both female run cultures) as they expect subservience from those men.
Dave Smith
2025-01-18 02:33:46 +0000 UTCSo there os probably four steps: 1. You first need to understand what women and men value. Women value equality, men value fairness. Men value performance, women image. Men value manners, women ego. Men value honesty, women feelings. etc. 2. You then need to understand the ‘real’ differences between men & women Think about this, if you let women define themselves how they want, as they are dishonest, they’re not going to say: “short term think, chaos vs order, not able to understand truth or process information clearly, endlessly compliant”. They will instead say: “Good looking, stong, smart, amazing, boss babe queens” (which is exactly the same in China and Vietnam and Philippines and Thailand. Exactly). 3. Think of the incentive structures. If women can get a ‘dowry’ or ‘bride price’ (Thailand, China) then why the fuck not. I mean, if we could say: “Only I can see your body and no one else cam touch ever and you are a virgin when we are married” we would do it. i.e. hijabs/islam. Also, if you can have 5 sugar daddies sending you $2000 per month and also have a husband you love, why not (Australia). Or, if you can have 4 wives, why not (muslim). 4. Put it all together Once you know what men and women value, understand their differences especially in thinking and then apply that to what incentives the country would put in place, wallah you can see which is masculine, which is feminine etc.aa
Dave Smith
2025-01-18 02:20:44 +0000 UTCAt first I didn’t think much of it but now… yeah scary. Didn’t even ask. “Are you willing to die for me, i might have an opportunity for you“ would have been polite to ask. No but seriously is he atleast was informed what he was potentially getting into.
Peter
2025-01-18 02:09:56 +0000 UTCDrizzle…. Drizzle….
Peter
2025-01-18 02:02:44 +0000 UTCThe best way to think of it, is not like; “women are genuinely in charge”, is more like two different species of human. The ‘male’ phylum and the ‘female phylum’. Like two totally seperate species (which I believe is true and we are gathering data currently to prove it). For example, the DNA of children from single mother’s actually changes. You could look up ‘bonobos’ and ‘chimpanzees’ as the two groups (chimpanzees with an alpha male and bonobos with an alpha female) function very similar to the male & female run human societies. So it’s not ‘who is the figure head’ or ‘CEO’ (how they want you to think of it in female-run societies), which you could call feminist, socialist, post-modern, communist, left wing, liberal or whatever other word they throw on top. It is ‘which gender do they base their decisions on? Do they base it on what men value or women? Do they value equality? or fairness? (essentially an eternal craving to stamp out FOMO, which women massively stuggle with and men don’t). (China vs say Do they value hypergamy (open access to high value men and prostitution without judgement)? (thailand) or chastity? (Japan) Do they value image? (China) or Truth (Hong Kong) Do they value humility (Norway) or ego? (Vietnam) Do they listen to children (Greta thornberg) or adults (korea) Once you can see what women and men value, you can then look at the country and see what it values and that will tell which which gender it ‘worships’. Also, once you know this you can predict laws, I know pretty confidently what the laws in Qatar will be, as it is masculine run and what they will be in Columbia as is female run. Here is some more differences: 1. Making dating ‘longer’, as women fall in love longer. So in Bangladesh something like 90% of women are married by 20, whereas 90% of Australian women are single by thirty. Same goes for china. In Japan, people will say they are ‘in a couple’ after a date or two. As we, as men, have decided if we will marry a girl in 1-2 dates, we don’t need more time, they do. 2. Women are short term thinking: So feminine countries inflate everything with debt. Guys massively massively massively understimate how short term thinking women are. Saying: “lets have a party to save the economy” guys immedately think: “how would that save the economy?” but girls essentially don’t think and just think, well we’ll have fun tonight. So drinking, smoking etc. is all banned. 3. An interesting one is porn. Porn empowers men. Let me repeat that, PORN EMPOWERS MEN. It gives us essentially a harem and takes women’s sexual power away. So in female run societies it is banned, so China, Thailand etc. porn is banned, and not only is prostution also legal, the whole country becomes prostitution with women demanding money to be married (the mother). 4. Women in these countries look for a ‘slave’ as a husband, not a leader. Watch some of these chinese leftover women videos: https://youtu.be/mc7a-CAQ3BA?si=vdy-C5bCml0rInBd this also co-incides with the short term thinking. Thinking long term, it makes way more sense for women to have kids 15-25, then work, study & make a career 25-85 (60 years) but in femle run socieites they ALL make it so women are the ones who study (to maintain ppwer and for the mothers to trip up their daughters and get them off the dating market, that’s a deeper one to go into) 5. Women have a larger hippacampus, which is our memory centre, so all education becomes about compliance and memory, not logic and IQ, which women could never compete on. 6. Women have a smaller amygdala, which leads to women setting all rules with arguments. This one was really helpful to figure out and it’s why women want relationships to take so long to start. As they can then constantly push the boundaries, break the guy down and eventually have all the rules in their favour. The opposite is religion, where say the girl must wear certain things, act a certain way and be a virgin before marriage. In female-run countries, when women have the choice and are in charge, they instead sleep and chat with multiple guys at the same time attempting to manipulate and control all of them. The ‘most’ compliant man at the end marries her. We call this ‘happy wife, happy life’. This happens on a country level too, where in say Japan or a muslim country, laws are just set. As an example, you and me could just sit down and say: “okay, tax is 10% flat”, fraud is illegal, etc. Whereas in these countries it’s all done through protests and whinging and media campaigns and lying politicians etc. 7. One interesting one is voice. I went to Taiwan and was surprised, not just that it seemed like Japan, but with how the voices of the girls is so cute. Mainland Chinese, especially the women essentially scream when they talk. 8. You are taught in female-run socities to be ‘scared’ and hate those of male-run: China with Japan & Taiwan: https://youtube.com/shorts/eEVsemV5KkU?si=JGp1ATYi2SYfyrff We in Australia were taught to be terrified of muslims ‘blowing us up’. Isreal with muslims. 9. Long term vs short term plans: Have a look at the country and think, do they make long term plans to grow the economy and lower corporate tax so EVERY company in the world registers in their country? Like Dubai and Hong Kong? (masculine) Or do they give out ‘stimulus cheques’ and just pretend printing money will make the country rich? (feminine)? 10. A weird one, I just can’t seem to figure out is pronouns. In Thailand, with every sentence you literally say: “I am a man” at the end of the sentence. It is being pushed in Australia to have (she/her) on your profile. Why? I still haven’t figured this one out. But if they have a ‘feminine’ and ‘masculine’ language is most likely a female-run society. (this one isn’t a great base to go off I am sure there is male-run spanish countries but I haven’t looked into south america much yet).
Dave Smith
2025-01-18 01:09:40 +0000 UTC@Dave Smith - There certainly is a LOT to not just unpack, but maybe also interpret and even decipher, like the counter-intuitive idea of the UK actually not being a "progressive" land, but "male run". I haven't been there in quite some years, but I would be positively SHOCKED to discover that they recently reversed well over a century of "enlightenment" towards the cause of "human rights". My impression was that they were closer to the GOLD STANDARD on progressive issues, second only perhaps to Canada (or "Tranada" as they like to call their cultural cousins across the pond). And that China, who has policies VEHEMENTLY opposed to "Western Feminism" would be "woman run"? I will have to digest much of this.
Joseph Omega
2025-01-17 23:39:25 +0000 UTC@Joseph I personally don’t think women mature too far. They definitely never mature ‘outside’ of themselves. @daniel - I believe women are endlessly narsisitic. When a man act’s as self-involved or callous as a woman it seems ‘evil’ or bizzare or lacking empathy. But a woman punching her husband in the face, or breaking his x-box to laugh at him. Then the response being absolutely no remorse, from a man would be ‘strange’ from a woman would be expected. The thing I want to point out though, is that globally, this is not ‘entertained’ everywhere. In America, a woman might be watching her husband play video games, realise it’s not making her money then pour water on the machine, then yell at him. A woman in Japan is not going to do that. whether this is programming and the girl actually ‘respects’ men (which women in America and other female-run cultues are definitely not taugth to respect men) or it’s just a cultural expectation, either way the result is she wouldn’t do it. A direct comparrison would be a guy’s constant desire to hit people is maintained by law and culture. So some culture’s regulate women’s shitty behaviour, some don’.t Another good example is the sluts in the gym. They’re allowed to just run rampant right and have ruined the gym but there’s no way that is happening in like Iran or Qatar. So come countries allow and even embrace women being shitty. Some put a stop to it. Your choice is which do you want to live in.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 21:12:56 +0000 UTC5. Womrn push the west is progressive, when it’s really not As I went through in 4, women’s tool for power is manipulation, so instead of calling it: “Female-run” they brand it “progressive”. If you point out the truth, that Vietnam and China’s whole ‘shtick’ is that it ‘empowered women’ and they already played out all the nonsense decades ago. That America now spits and we’re seeing more and more as it beomes more: “men suck, women are awesome” in all media and moviess. That all of it, none of it is in any way unique, interesting or in any way new. So un-new, to be exact that there is stories in the old testament. The story or Babel, or China, or any other communist (female-run) country has all ended the same way with faminine and everyone being super poor (while maintaining the strong arrogance which is so redidulous, but anyway). So they love to brand China or Venezuela or any other clearly ‘female-centric’ country as male run.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 19:56:12 +0000 UTC4. China, Vietnam, Thailand, Philippines etc being female run and is contrary to populat opinion. 1. Dishonesty and ‘ignoring’ is women’s tool for power men’s is violence and competence. I could write endlessly on this and go into all the key markers of male-run vs female run. There’s not an endless list of differences though and once you know the core differences is easy to identify, but I will go with ‘honesty’. Dishonesty and manipulation is women’s tool to gain power. Men using force and competance. So, you will see lots of scams and dishonesty in female run socities. India, China, Philippines, Thailand. You will not find this in Pakistan, or Bangladesh (both muslim) or Japan or Korea. 2. In male-run societies humility & performance is valued, in female-run societies image & ego is valued. Expanding on disnonestry. There is certain things you absolutely cannot say in female run societies or people will flip out and generally it is simply telling the truth about something negative. Which is colloqually called ‘saving face’. So you can’t just call someone fat, or say a girl is a slut or say anything negative about anyone. This will manifest in many ways, but the best example I can think of on the top of my head, is if you say in Australia: “An 18 year old is hotter than a 38 year old” which is just patternly true, the women will call you a pedophile. The men might hit you. So the people from these countries tend to have huge over-inflated egos as have never gotten negative feedback, China, United States, India. ` 3. Friendly vs dutiful People in female-run societies are friendly. The smile more ‘appear’ more welcoming, but it is purely to extend the image there place is a great place and to improve their image. You can call this ‘fake’. Australians are like this, Canadians. They are smiling to get something from you or to maintain an image, not because they are happy. It’s not a negative per se, it’s something I like about Thailand over say, Russia, where Russians just look miserable. But it does often catch me off guard a Thai person seeming like a friend but just wants to sell me something. In stark comparison, people from masculine run societies actually value traditions and duty. Everyone likes traditions, sure, but Japanese are not going to be late, ever, and that is ‘tradition’ but it’s a sense of ‘doing what is right’ which just lacks in female-run societies, where their own ego is more impotant. 4. Always respect women: Female centric vs male centric is key. The words ‘respect’. Is the most obvious indicator. Who should ‘be respectful’? and who should ‘be respected’. Should the woman respect her husband and cover up and wear a hijab? Should men respect women and open doors? Should you respect the ederly and disabled? Should you respect those in charge or your boss? The reason this is important is because respect means ‘listening’. That’s all. So in korea they say: “Respect elders”. In Australiathey say: “Respect women” so everyone listens to women. It’s not about the figure head, it’s about who the society listens to. As someone who grew up in Australia, I was taught many times: “Always respect women, always respect women”. that phrase, which is clearly the same in China, Philippines and the others I mentioned they will spit back to you any time you do ANYTHING they don’t like. Date a columbian girl and while she is fucking 3 guys and posting her ass for the world to see, if you don’t respond exactly the right way to her text: “you should show respect” There’s so many ways this manifests and shapes the town/country, but the core thing is that women hate taking responsibility so almost always have a male figure head like North Kore, China, Thailand, Philippines etc. Women are controlling these countries with ‘narrative’ and not rules or diectly, to avoid accountability, so you can’t just look at the figure head of the country. You have to look at what the country stands for/believes 5. It is on a spectrum Some good examples I can think of is Japan is full male-run. People show up on time, politeness, promistuity and dishonesty is not accpeted, then say korea is similar but a bit more relaxed, then taiwan even more so. All male run, but different degrees. Then Malaysia & indonesia tilt towards male-run but not intensely. Then Thailand, Australia are more centred, but definitely more female run. Then Vietnam, China and North Korea are full female-run. For middle east Saudi is 100% male run, Indonesia/Turkeu is kind of in the middle and this is not allowed to be said, but Isreal is then on the other side being female-run. Not as far on the spectrum as say China or Australia. But for the middle easy is the furthest. i can’t tell you for Europe or South America, but the super female-run ones are obvious like Spain, Brazil. The UK/Ireland like in the middle. The really important thing to remember is culture is ‘all encompassing’. Although Thailand & Australia don’t ‘seem’ as intensely female-run as say China. They are. And it is fully female-run so don’t be fooled. Same goes for bali ‘seems’ female-run but is part of a muslim country, so don’t be smoking weed there. So there is a spectrum, but treat that carefully. I think it’s just better to identify if it is female or male run then find somewhere you like to live there. Not. on the flip side, like move to the US, Australia or Canada then look for the most male-run (conservative) area as you still function under the female-set rules. There’s no escaping the system inside the system. I could list more, bit I think that’s a good start.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 19:34:41 +0000 UTC3. Unexpected challenges of passport bro: hmmm… In female-run societies, it’s all about image, not substance. Everything in Thailand ‘looks’ nice. But you can’t drink the water, people rarely use gloves when cooking, the beaches are super gross. and even the girls, they look really good but they’re riddled with STD’s and have horrible attitudes. Although short term it’s an upside, long term the biggest downside is the women. They are the same as Australia, I would say even less traditional and even more disrespectful, which is totally engrained in their culture. The guys are super passive/placating/subserviant, so they never give you any troubles or are ever violent, but the women, really are garbage, other than how they look. All Thai girls will almost immediately demand you stop talking to other girls, within minutes of meeting but will still sleep with and chat with guys and use instagram. So that feminist double-standard in Australia is exactly the same here, if not worse. That’s probably the biggest thing I’ve encountered, I mean small scams here and there, but nothing too annoying. The people here seem to act like children and just the women are rude. Which, to me is enough to not want to live here forever, short term is okay. But maybe you do resonate with Thai cuture, I think that’s the best part, there’s so many places to try and see and if you din’t like where you are (which I would argue is on a spectrum of male-female run) you can find somewhere which is a better fit.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 19:30:51 +0000 UTC2. Passport bros is good on paper: Here’s some of the benefits, which I hadn’t thought of for a while until you asked, so thanks. 1. Non limits on women in female-run counteies, wices in male-run countries Almost all passport bros move to female-run countries, including nomad capitalist. They never talk about Taiwan, Japan, Nigeria or any of the male-run countries so they all ignore the fact that feminism isn’t everywhere. You mentioned Africe Nigeria for example would be far better for finding a wife (male run), but will get endless matches in kenya (female run) as there is no limits on hypergamy. 2. Higher standard of living: If you ‘can’ get the high pay then work remotely is even better. I live in Thailand and everything is 2-10 times cheaper than Austeralia. Except like apple stuff and a couple of things, but is right next to China and Japan’s cars are made here, so almost everything else. 3. Hosptials are great and cheap. My travel insurance (which you can get cheap 12 month plans) covers all my things + health related things plus the hospitals in Thailand are a pleasure compared to australia. 4. Everything is convenient (because of apps) Food + transportation etc. is easy because of grab + uber, so everything is accessible (totally different point, but the reason these places aren’t just cess pools of scams and BS is because of the ‘masculine run’ societies ‘controlling’ their behaviour with reviews but that’s a whole different point), people still do the odd scam in Thailand but not businesses because of google reviews and other review sites they can’t. I can’t really think of anything else. I pay my rent for the year upfront and get a discount which is cool. 5. Dating options For ‘fun’ I think Thailand is the best option because of the DTV they just made which is a 5 year visa for $300USD for remote workers, I have that. But you’re just not going to escape ‘feminins’ if that is your goal, as it is mine. But anywhere female-run with a low GDP per capita is GREAT for short term dating for guys. The female-run means there is no boundaries on hypergamy and low GDP per capita makes you are rich in comparison. Remember $2000 GDP per capita in Kenya, compared to $60,000 in Australia, is the same difference as $60,000 vs $2,000,000. So granted you are in shape, you are now an ‘in shape’ millionaire, with a ‘normal’ job. Female run, we’re looking at: Philippines, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Mexico. Brazil etc. I looked it up today because I was bored and a doctor in Thailand is paid the same as someone working in Woolworths (Australia’s walmart). If you want to start a life, the gold card in Taiwan for $350 is fantastic, or if you need to get your pay ‘in person’ Qatar or Saudi Arabia is where I would look. For a wife, we’re talking Morocco, Nigeria, Indonesia. Or if you go live there: Norway, Japan or any other male-run society.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 19:13:11 +0000 UTC1. Not many people have the luxury (or resource) to pick up and leave: Qatar has 3 times the average pay of Australia. The average pay in Australia is $60,000AUD (taxed down to $45,000), Qatar is $114,000 USD ($150,000AUD) with no tax. Taiwan has a gold card of $350USD and you get immediate residence, permanent residence in 3 years if you stay there for 6 months of the year. Almost all countries you can work around visas by making a company and hiring yourself. So if you work online, there is obviously more options, but if you don’t, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Norway and a few others have high pay. Which are the first two things to consider: pay + tax.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 19:07:54 +0000 UTCTo your point on Dr Taraban. As women are less intelligent than men and more compliant, in school they switched ‘logic’ with ‘call to authority’ and memory so women can compete (and win). So instead of writing an essay in school like: “this is how this works” you write an essay like: “This person said this and this is an example’ as women can do that better. Just mentioning someone’s name doesn’t make it right. I don’t see any evidence that women see respect differently (we both understand it as who should be listened to), but I do see that their means of enforcing power is different. Men’s is with violence + competence, women’s is with manipulation and relying on authority. So Steve jobs vs a government. Women can’t wield the physical strength, so instead manipulate the men to wield it on their behalf. Some countries/companies fall for this (simping) i.e. australia, China, Vietnam, Columbia and the country is then ‘female run’ by proxy, i.e. simping. And some countries didn’t fall for it and the guys stood firm: “no, we don’t want you in politics, no you can’t wear slutty clothing, no we’re not lying to everyone. i,e, islam (and all muslim countries), Japan, Korea, Taiwan etc. In these countries the same BS that women do in female-run countries or towns is not accepted. It is the same ‘within’ a country so Texas vs New York. Which we colloqually call liberal and conservative or traditional vs communist, but is is fundamentall ‘who is respected’ i.e. ‘who is listened to’. Is it women’s thoughts/goals/feelings being the core driver of the rules, or is it men’s.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 18:56:37 +0000 UTCMy point quickly: There is socities that respect men and societies that respect women. Respect = listening. To your point, no, they don’t see it differently both understand it as listening, it is the culture that determines who is listend to.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 18:45:59 +0000 UTCGreat video, thank you. Two more examples: male infant genital mutilation and maternal exclusive control over pregnancy. In the case of male infant genital mutilation, mothers exercise complete authority over circumcision, irrespective of a father’s preference. If the mother wants her baby boy’s healthy genitals to be mutilated, it will be done. Neither the baby boy nor the father can prevent this gross violation of the boy’s right to bodily integrity. In the second case, a woman has sole authority over pregnancy outcome decision making. The father has no legal recourse for any choice she makes. If she wants the baby killed, it is killed. If she wants to keep it, she’s accorded custody. If she wishes to place it up for adoption, she may do so. If she wishes to give up the child to the State, she may do so. (If she’s married, her husband may be able to prevent these last two outcomes. If she’s unmarried, the father will not be able to prevent adoption or surrender.)
Jeff Hazelwood
2025-01-17 18:39:31 +0000 UTCSimple explanation to a complex problem needs to really throughtly thought out. I do see similarities to Dr Tararbans „men and women“ understand respect differently. Men understand respect as deference. Someone you respect has ligitimacy telling you what to do. Women will back talk and all manner of rebellion and claim to respect He goes on to tell women, consider a job you want to keep. You won’t back talk, and f you back talk. Would you talk to them that way infront of a customer? These places you speak of… somehow I am not convinced that they are as submissive to women as you think. Social media can fug up you sence of what is common because the 15 cases of outrageous delulu women are force fed to you and all you see if nutters. That said, those 15 nutters are probably 3 times as many as guys not to mention its 100x much re tolerated
Peter
2025-01-17 17:38:40 +0000 UTC😅 a man of my heart and again i realise, for all my talk the core point is lost. What is the core message you are trying to convey ?
Peter
2025-01-17 17:27:00 +0000 UTC@Dave Smith - Of course I resonate with the logical sentiment, but not very many have the luxury (or resources) to just pick up and leave, and even if they did, there is, in addition to any language (and interpretive) barrier, there is the CULTURAL and LEGAL impediments involved in such a drastic relocation -- they may be FAR greater than the purely FINANCIAL or LOGISTICAL ones I would think. "Passport Bros" certainly SOUND good on paper, but I wonder all the hidden and unexpected challenges they face in practice (especially in the long term after their wives become "acclimatized" to their new status and lifestyle). Also, I have never visited many of these places myself (I've been to Colombia), but are you saying that such historically tradtional places like China, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam, Spain and Columbia are "women-run" societies (because the women wear slutty clothes and show no respect to men), while Norway, Finland, Japan, Taiwan and Indonesia are the OPPOSITE? That certainly DOES seem to run almost completely contrary to popular opinion. What would you say about African and Middle Eastern countries (I've been to several of those)? In addition, can you elaborate on the lie that women push that the "West" (the birthplace of Feminism) is "progressive" (but is actually NOT)?
Joseph Omega
2025-01-17 17:02:07 +0000 UTCSorry for flooding your comments section, but I really want to get this message out there and I don’t have a platform like yours.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 14:00:25 +0000 UTCTo really see this. Just change the language women use (women manipulate by change words/meanings as well). For example for dating in these countries they say: “be loyal” and “be respectful” wha they are really saying: “Be subservient to me and my parents and listen to me (and I won’t listen to you).” It is quite effective, as you read it and it kind of feels ‘reciprocal’ but dating is not reciprocal. You don’t say: “Looking for a submissive loyal woman” intending to also be submissive & loyal in the same way. And, in practice these women aren’t loyal or respectful, they’re ‘looking’ for it not looking to be it. As the culture is: “women should be dominant and men submissive”
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 13:51:32 +0000 UTCSo my advice is leave. I have been researching/going to multiple countries. Japan, Korea or Indonesia is where I will eventually land. Also, you don’t have to find the partner in that country. You can find a girl in Philippines or Columbia then move to Taiwan. They probably won’t ‘like’ it as they don’t have open reign to be rude to whoever they like and walk around being slutty or yelling at you in public, showing you no respect and all the other ‘freedoms’ they are afforded in a female run country. But the rules & environment won’t tolerate it and look at them the same way. A slutty girl wearing slutty clothes in the gym ij Japan will not get praise, people will distance themselves and complain to management. So if you don’t like it; there is a clear path to a better environment. Just might take some planning.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 13:47:05 +0000 UTCIt’s not ‘western’ that’s a lie women push to make it seem ‘progressively’ it’s from any society which ‘respects’ women (i.e. listens to women) and by default them doesn’t listen to/respecr men. China, Philippines, Vietnam, Spain, Columbia are all the same. Th opposite being Norway, Finland; Japan, Indonesia. So simply ‘leaving the west’ and then going to China, Thailand or Columbia you will find exactly the same women, actually worse as ‘respect women’ is even more engrained and part of their culture totally.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 13:43:06 +0000 UTCWomen control through manipulation & arguments, not rules. So if you even mention Australia, China, Spain or any other female-run (listen to women i.e. respect women) is female run they flip out. “
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 13:38:41 +0000 UTCThese masculine vs feminine countries still fight so Iran vs irael, Russia vs Ukraine (less totally clear). China whinges about Taiwan. But it really is the core cultural difference. There’s only really 2 cultures in the world and they come down to that core difference. Which gender do they ‘respect’ (listen to). The good thing now is you can just get on a plane and leave, rather then fight the entire society to change it. Which won’t work until culture accepts it.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 13:32:30 +0000 UTCRespect means listening. That’s it. If you ‘respect’ women. it means that’s who society listens to. Korea respects (listens to) elders, muslim countries listen to (respect) men. There are female-run and male-run societies. If you wake up to this (the red pill) the only solution is to move to a country who respect men. Japan, Korea, Norway, Finland, dubai, Qatar, Taiwan. The women are not going to throw away their power willingly and the guys won’t wake up to it anytime soon. The wars were fought years ago and the countries are already split between these two. Pakistan vs India. China vs Taiwan & Japan. North vs South Korea.
Dave Smith
2025-01-17 13:31:00 +0000 UTC@Hyperion - I'm not so sure. I think men have LONG (if not TRADITIONALLY) treated woman as moral superiors -- it is the superiority of the perceived innocent and sweet and pure and helpless (as in "the meek shall inherit the Earth"). It is very similar to that of the "love of baser animals", but on steroids: The fact that women posses substantial neotenous traits across not the physical, but also the behavioral, tends to make them effectively "perpetually cute" in male eyes (similar to those perpetually small and cute and cuddly pets like poodles that we have bred into existence as lifelong toys, and that can no longer survive on their own), and hence the very EPITOME of "pure innocence". The only difference being that the human female pet BITES. As for men perceiving themselves as "morally superior", I believe whenever this has ever been conceived (usually intellectually) it has just reflected typical male bravado, which tends to collapse when smitten by "the perfect woman of our dreams". Men are near PERFECT romantics when appropriately triggered -- and I suspect EACH of us has our price. Instead, I have postulated that men are "hypergamous" but in relation to the perceived moral or perhaps "soft power" superiority in women -- possibly instilled into us at a very young age by the "perfect" images of our mothers ("What did you just call my momma?!"). It is the complement to the hypergamy of women with respect to "hard power" superiority in men -- possibly instilled into them at a very young age by the "perfect" images of their fathers (often manifested as "Daddy Issues"). I had a very VERY long exchange with ChatGPT on this very topic -- here are illustrative summary paragraphs from the oracle: Conclusion: Hypergamy in Different Realms While men might not traditionally seek hard power superiority in women, they could be said to exhibit hypergamy in relation to soft power. This hypergamy seeks women who are perceived as superior in areas of emotional, moral, and relational influence. It complements the traditional understanding of female hypergamy by showing that men, too, can pursue partners who excel in areas that provide them with value and support within a relationship. This nuanced perspective helps explain why relationships can be destabilized when traditional gender roles are reversed or when the balance of hard and soft power shifts. It suggests that both men and women have hypergamous tendencies, but they express them in ways that align with their evolutionary and social roles—hard power for women seeking men, and soft power for men seeking women.
Joseph Omega
2025-01-17 04:04:40 +0000 UTCMen have always loved baser animals such as horses, dogs, and cats, and accepted their nature. Our mistake with women is when we try to treat them as moral equals or superiors. This is not to say that women are baser animals, just that they are our complements. Across societies that persists throughout centuries and millenniums, men were the moral superior because they were held to that standard, whereas women were not. As such, men lead, women follow. Men act, women react. This is the nature of our species.
Hyperion
2025-01-17 00:50:49 +0000 UTC@Hyperion - I think your question answers itself. 👍
Joseph Omega
2025-01-16 22:14:47 +0000 UTC@Hyperion - Seems like, by the time you find out who they REALLY are, you'd realize there would have been nothing there to love ... 💁♂️ The only time to TRULY "love" a woman is when you are too clueless or too horny to care. I'm being facetious of course ... or am I? 🤔
Joseph Omega
2025-01-16 22:13:15 +0000 UTCA bit campy, I admit, but ... https://youtube.com/shorts/8EDCWgpf4aQ 😊
Joseph Omega
2025-01-16 22:06:37 +0000 UTCIf you think women would line up to date a handicapped veteran, disabuse yourself of the brainwashing. The circumstances in Ukraine should be the most potent red-pill suppository for men who are still under the illusion that modern western females have any appreciation, gratitude, or respect for male sacrifice. Look at the number of French women who fraternized with the Nazi occupiers during Vichy France, while their compatriot men were dying in battle or being sent to camps as POWs. Read up on the war brides dynamic as described in Rollo Tomassi's Rational Male, ever wonder why women get over relationships as quick as an about-face? Ukrainian women are regarded to be the more conservative sort even across Europe, yet they would still act in ways that serve their female imperative. A large portion have unapologetically fled to neighboring countries and started relationships with foreigners, even those who are already married whose husbands are off fighting and dying in the war. It's an unapologetic confession of their nature, what more evidence do men need to truly see women for who they are? Women and society at large have always regarded men as the disposable sex, and will ruthlessly and thoughtlessly sacrifice men off to serve their agenda. My fellow men, value yourselves and respect yourselves foremost, serve only your purpose. Women are only along for the ride. As far as relationship with a woman is concerned, she's not yours; it's just your turn. Do not hate women for their nature, understand it and accept it for what it is. Only then should one make the decision to love them for who they truly are.
Hyperion
2025-01-16 11:56:49 +0000 UTCThe bus interaction begs a question. Out of all the men on the bus, why would the woman pick the man who looked to be a tired blue collar construction worker who happened also to be a person of color? If I were to venture a guess, I should think she felt entitled over those whom she thinks is of the lower rungs of social hierarchy, i.e. the invisibles. Would she demand the same from a tall beefy hunk of a man or a well-dressed successful looking business man -- it would be rare for the likes of such to take public transit in the first place -- to give up his seat for her? It's not difficult to re-imagine a similar interaction but in the context of middle or high school, from whom would the girls demand their privilege?
Hyperion
2025-01-16 11:24:14 +0000 UTC@Christophe Ruef - Ultimately, yes. But I wonder the extent to which the two are related in some cases -- it seems easier to educate a smaller homegeneous population with a set of consistent values than a much larger multi-ethnic one. Just speculation of course, for I've never actually visited your country.
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 18:37:29 +0000 UTCI think it's more an education problem..
Christophe Ruef
2025-01-15 18:29:52 +0000 UTC@Christophe Ruef - Could this be because, though it is an independent nation, Switzerland is still a relatively small land compared to the megalopolises of the US and UK? Still, I've discovered a similar behavior as what you've experienced across even the larger cities in Canada and many "Third World" countries.
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 18:03:17 +0000 UTC@Vinnie Searl - I know it was intended as a rhetorical question, but the answer is "entitlement", part of the BIG FIVE toxic female behaviors, acronymed "SPIES": for "Self-indulgence, Petulance, Impulsiveness, Entitlement and Self-absorption".
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 17:58:03 +0000 UTC@Lioninwinter - With so many similar responses and comments here, it is TRULY gratifying and encouraging to know that so many men still retain their intrinsic sense of honor and duty (even in the face of ridicule and thanklessness) -- both rather alien concepts and traits to most modern women. 👍 Perhaps the rumors of chivalry's death has been greatly exaggerated (or at least, premature).
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 17:52:07 +0000 UTC@John Moose - Again, it is up to men to be the "grown ups", yes. 👍
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 17:49:51 +0000 UTC@John - Well said! I perfectly agree. 👍
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 17:48:26 +0000 UTCYet another milestone in Alexander's conceptual evolution, and one that ties directly into his previous ones on "niceness" and "kindness". Please excuse the repetition for those who have already read it, but I previously posted the following exchange which eventually ended on the important concept of "sustainability" and introduced the complementary gendered traits of "chivalry" and "gracesousness": https://chatgpt.com/share/67354622-ad5c-800a-ad47-966255548ef4 Again, the summary conclusion: "Sustainability is the crucial factor that determines whether acts of niceness and kindness are healthy and effective in the long run. When these acts are sustainable, they can have a lasting, positive impact, allowing individuals to continue contributing to others’ well-being. Prioritizing oneself is justified when it serves the purpose of maintaining this sustainability, ensuring that kindness is not only present in the short term but also capable of being sustained over a lifetime. This approach allows for the optimal balance between self-care and self-sacrifice, ultimately leading to greater and more enduring positive outcomes for all involved." And there was this brief exchange on the origins and use of the associated concept coined "self-care": https://chatgpt.com/share/65735068-6ffc-4693-86d3-6812119648a4 that concluded with: "It's conceivable that the promotion of 'self-care' within the feminist movement could have served as a preemptive strategy to counter accusations of selfishness or self-centeredness, though this may not have been the primary or explicit intent. "The feminist movement, especially during its early waves, often faced criticism and backlash from those who perceived it as threatening traditional societal roles or as being overly focused on individual women’s needs at the expense of family or community. By framing 'self-care' as a necessary act of empowerment and resistance rather than indulgence, feminists could reframe the narrative to emphasize that caring for oneself was essential for the collective strength and sustainability of the movement. "In this sense, self-care was positioned as a communal responsibility rather than a purely individualistic pursuit. It highlighted the idea that women, in order to fight against systemic oppression and advocate effectively for societal change, needed to ensure their own well-being. This recontextualization of self-care helped to mitigate the potential for the movement to be dismissed as self-centered, instead presenting it as a vital component of social and political activism. "So, while the focus on self-care likely had many motivations, including genuine concern for women’s health and resilience, it also likely served to address and deflect potential critiques that the movement was selfish or overly individualistic."
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 17:45:14 +0000 UTCAs far as giving up a seat goes, that's a personal decision and it's something I will always do, no matter how the woman is treating me or how she requests it. It's like Alexander mentioned, it's something I do for myself more than for them. I don't really expect anything in return - even a simple thank you. Women disabused me of that notion a long time ago. This topic goes deep, doesn't it? It goes beyond our bodies to our time, our money, our energy, our productive years....it's all something we are expected to freely give on the altar of woman. I am lucky, my wife is (for the most part) appreciative and thankful, but when she isn't I never beg for it. Over time I've just come to the realization that many women do simply believe that it's why men exist. We have to elevate ourselves above all that and do what feels right, authentic and dignified to us.
John
2025-01-15 13:43:32 +0000 UTCAnother great video. Much of what is freely given is taken for granted. And women are happy to ask for whatever they want with no shame / simply consider it a gift just like a beer at the bar. So it is up to the men to draw the lines. The degree to which these women receive these gifts varies by their good looks and these freely given actions tend to erode the woman's character over time. So men, freely give but be judicious.
John Moose
2025-01-15 13:27:18 +0000 UTCI try to help other people, but don't go looking to fo it. Holding a door, giving up a seat, cutting a neighbors grass who is struggling etc. I do these things without expectation of any thanks at all. In fact, I'm shocked when I have gratitude expressed in any meaningful way. That said, I don't blame others who don't do these things. The entitled attitudes of modern women are disgusting.
Lioninwinter
2025-01-15 11:59:41 +0000 UTCI would also, quite spontaneously also. In Switzerland, there is respect in big towns as well. Respect for new life in our worldly demographic is valuable. Woman must embrace their role as mothers and be grateful to live in safe places. Won't she dare be bitchy about it. I can understand to accompany the girl to her car, as it also could be a sign of interest towards a man, an excuse to be alone together, in a romantic way. But yeah. A bitch is a bitch...
Christophe Ruef
2025-01-15 11:20:47 +0000 UTCWhy couldn’t another women give up her seat for a pregnant woman
Vinnie Searl
2025-01-15 09:46:42 +0000 UTC@Julian Bell - It is a TRULY SAD indictment on "Western" culture that a man would feel that they had to even CONSIDER this -- there is not much more below this in the barrel. 😪
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 09:27:35 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - So telling how ashamed even the women on the bus looked. I wonder how this would have played out here in the US. I've heard how they (often women) used to spit on Vietnam Vets in the 70's, curiously at the height of the "Feminist Revolution".
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 09:25:06 +0000 UTC@Daniel L Chin - It is a well-known trope that whenever a child would happen to wake up earlier than their parents they, feeling hopelessly bored so early in the morning, would just barge in to their parents room without a care as to their wakefulness or exhaustion, climb on the bed and jump up and down on them until they have to no choice but to get up -- interestingly it is ALWAYS the DAD that the child would invariably jump on the most, for HE is the main source of "fun" (read "creativity", "boundaries" and "accomplishment") that could entertain them -- in contrast, MOMs are BOOORRIING ... they can go back to sleep. A cautionary tale that may help explain why "women jump on men" with such shameless abandon.
Joseph Omega
2025-01-15 09:21:39 +0000 UTCJust want to commend you, Alexander on the job you do. Just today I wondered how a content creator is able to come up with content. This video comes after I was pondering a clip by Casey Zander discussing how women do not want their man to engrossed in hobbies that do not directly benefit her. To paraphrase...she has no interest in him being happy, her only concern is how he can benefit her, his playing World of Warcraft (that is a game I take it) is wasting time he could be spending making more money to benefit her. Rollo Tomassi expands the idea further in how women don't even want you to be taking a nap. One comment recalled how the women he was driving with was perturbed that he was sleeping during her hour of driving on a 10 hour trip in which he drove nine hours. Your video expands even further on how women disregard men's efforts and struggles to make reality better for them. Seems to underline that feminism was never about equality but about power and control. However, that has actually led to exposing true female nature in it's various forms. I do believe, more than ever, evolutionary psychology better explains this rather than some moral dilemma. If the guy is napping he's not out hunting or plowing the field and the women know they aren't physically as capable of accomplishing such tasks. At least from the red pill perspective one can enquire to discern and understand where these behaviors originate rather than be stuck in frustrated acceptance of the mystery of female nature. No mystery....count on these behaviors to be hardwired.
Daniel L Chin
2025-01-15 08:38:15 +0000 UTCI'd definitely still give up my seat for a pregnant women.
Julian Bell
2025-01-15 07:12:42 +0000 UTCThat Reddit story literally made my heart skip a beat that story was terrifying
Rahel
2025-01-15 06:46:22 +0000 UTCDisabled man gives up seat on a bus: https://youtube.com/shorts/mDB9FIlYYWE?si=ouyiC28fWtpVawB3
Eric Linden
2025-01-15 05:54:01 +0000 UTC
