PATREON EXCLUSIVE (Full Video): Artificial Intelligence will change the dating market
Added 2024-12-19 02:13:17 +0000 UTC
Comments
Eventually AI will replace coders for the most part. This is due to all the code having been solved, the AI simply needs to select the right structure and plug in the correct variables. The only place that coders will exist is to produce novel solutions for the AI to learn and use. We aren't quite there yet. It'll be a few more years.
Lokiare
2025-01-01 20:33:28 +0000 UTCThanks for the advice. I meant how how to set up an AI service on my site, but the answer is the same: ask chatgpt
Kevin Martin
2024-12-26 09:26:14 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - "Follow your passion" and "follow your dreams" is only as lucrative as the nature and quality of those passions and dreams - men and women choose differently, and are rewarded according to the demand afforded to these choices by the culture and its marketplace.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-21 16:51:40 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden & @AngMori - Yes, all of this is my observation as well, except to say that the voracious AI beast is not likely to stop with the consumption of low producing jobs, but increasingly higher producing ones as well -- there is NOTHING I see to stop this insatiable juggernaut. It is during this intermediary stage that "Hypergamy of Potential" can be recognized, capitalized on and cemented back into place. It's a very small window of opportunity however.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-21 16:35:56 +0000 UTCI work in healthcare. We used to have rooms and files filled with paperwork and medical records. Lots of jobs in medical records and other areas have been eliminated in recent history. We used to have dark room techs in Radiology. Who used to make all that film at Kodak, 3M and other companies? We used to employ curriers to transport film and medical records to other facilities. Those jobs and many related jobs have disappeared in very recent history. Where did all those employees go?
Eric Linden
2024-12-20 19:21:01 +0000 UTCWomen seem to be much more likely to pick a career based on their feelings. Men are more likely to pick logically.
Eric Linden
2024-12-20 19:00:58 +0000 UTCI agree. I’ve noticed over the span of my work life that management has gone from being mostly men to mostly women. Women really are the only ones in trouble. There will always be new jobs for men, and women’s jobs will continue to become obsolete.
Eric Linden
2024-12-20 18:58:53 +0000 UTCEvolution of jobs: Jobs throughout history have gone through an evolution- from men to women to obsolescence. The biggest jolt in known history was the Industrial Revolution . Before the Industrial Revolution, both men and women worked from the home. This took men out of the home, and gave all the jobs in the home to women. We see the same thing today in individual jobs. Example: Pharmacists. When I was a kid, all Pharmacists were men. Over the past 60 years Pharmacy schools have gone from 10% women to 90% women. Ask most pharmacists today, and they will tell you that pharmacists won’t exist in the near future. We can see the same evolution from men to women in many jobs today: teachers, engineers, taxi and bus drivers, police officers, accountants. Even actors used to all be men (men would dress up in drag to play women). Will all these jobs be obsolete some day? What is different now? In the past couple generations, there have been many jobs created just for women. Like all jobs for women, they will one day be obsolete.
Eric Linden
2024-12-20 18:52:12 +0000 UTCI've accurately measured my increase in productivity to a minimum of x 7,5 by now. This is the absolute, bare, measurable minimum, which is up from x 3, as measured 6 months after ChatGPT launched. These are bare minimums, because I've been able to complete tasks that were previously suitable for 3-man teams on my own, and the last one I did, I did in 40% of the allotted time. This does NOT account for the fact that I know my code holds a much higher level of quality than that of my peers, and the compounding effects of being able to be more productive, allowing me to rest more, making me more productive, allowing me to learn quicker, making me more productive.... Noone is getting replaced by AI. They're going to get replaced by those of us who have learned to use AI. And that does not only include peers, but the middle managers, because their necessity was questioned BEFORE AI. The middle manager who didn't really know anything about what's going on on a technical level, before AI? He's cooked, because those of us who have learned to use AI to be more productive and learn quicker at a compounding rate... It's one thing when a given worker had an efficiency level of 100%. Middle managers could bullshit their necessity to maintain that level. But when a few workers suddenly explode to 1000%, without any of that being traceable to the might middle manager? Yeah he's out. If one job is going to get completely automated, it's the asshole who sits and sends e-mails all day and wastes everyones time by daily meetings to 'ensure productivity'. When productivity skyrockets from a few individuals, the rest of the team will be laid off. That's going to decrease the complexity of the company structure, meaning the necessity of middle managers is no more :) God I'm looking forward to seeing their useless asses disappearing.
AngMori
2024-12-20 18:14:59 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I'm not sure that the same rules apply to AI and robotics -- I can't imagine which industries and activities will NOT be affected this time.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-20 15:52:20 +0000 UTCRe questionable educational choices, I work in the performing arts sector and there is insane over supply of girls trying to make it as a performer (dancer/musical theatre/actress). They go to the prestigious performing arts colleges (universities) rack up £50k of debt and while they may be talented & hardworking, the fundamental problem is the job pool has always been tiny and hasn't meaningfully grown (but the supply of college places has exploded). Effectively it's become a pseudo ponzi scheme, where girls train up to become performers, can't find a job as a practitioner but can find a job teaching and they funnel the next cohort of girls never informing them the harsh reality.... essentially girls just encourage other girls to make the same mistakes they did.
Simon
2024-12-20 11:41:16 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega- Nope. The same was said in the 90s about the computer when it entered the workplace. I lived through it. Other jobs sprung up. Before that it happened many times. The Industrial Revolution was the big one. I imagine it happened as far back as the invention of the wheel.
Eric Linden
2024-12-20 11:20:33 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - But doesn't AI suggest PERMANENT (or at least long-term) reduction in demand? 🤔
Joseph Omega
2024-12-20 06:40:35 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - RESILIENCE is the perseverance to keep TRYING (like during stalking and killing), while ENDURANCE is the perseverance to keep SUFFERING (like during pregnancy and childbirth). Men excel at one, while women excel at the other. Apparently evolutionary adaptations to societal roles.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-20 06:36:51 +0000 UTCThere will always be jobs, and supply will always eventually catch up to meet demand. The average man, though, can expect to have three or more careers in a lifetime. That means retraining for something totally different. Men are built for this. Women are not. Most women will give up after career #1 becomes obsolete.
Eric Linden
2024-12-20 02:52:20 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - Absent "shame", "accountability", "honor" or "duty", the movement towards "my body, my choice" will inevitably lead to EXTREMELY self-serving neotenous decision making.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-20 02:49:48 +0000 UTC@Jimmy Madrigal - I suspect we may BOTH be having a drink on each other, as both these sets of outcomes don't seem mutually exclusive -- technology tends to be morally and socially agnostic.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-20 02:40:35 +0000 UTC@CS & @JO - As we've seen in the last election, women will trend one way or another, but they will not vote in one block. The most successful voting block ever was black Americans, but even that block has started to fracture.
Eric Linden
2024-12-20 02:37:03 +0000 UTC@Kevin Martin - I personally use (and recommend) ChatGPT -- here are instructions (ironically written by ChatGPT) to get you started (if you have not already done so): https://chatgpt.com/share/6764d378-fdd4-800a-82bd-9d18ecfbff1e When you are all setup, you can simply ask it anything just as you would a person -- it is very accommodating of typos and bad phrasing and bad grammar (even in different languages). As you know your field and what you want to achieve better than anyone, just ask it for advice on how to get started using it (or any other AI tool) to accomplish your task, including detailed steps on how to proceed, where to find resources and even how to best approach asking it questions (called "prompts").
Joseph Omega
2024-12-20 02:20:18 +0000 UTCOh my god, i'm so sorry brother
Jimmy Madrigal
2024-12-20 02:13:23 +0000 UTC@JM &@JO - Women have all the control. They can lie and tell you they are on the pill. But they can also lie and tell you they are not taking the pill. And abortion - men have zero control. I have first hand knowledge as someone whose first son was aborted very much against MY wishes as we PLANNED the pregnancy.
Eric Linden
2024-12-20 02:11:46 +0000 UTCShort term, employment opportunities will be limited for women. But long term, supply will meet demand.
Eric Linden
2024-12-20 01:56:44 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega That is something I've considered. Any suggestions on how to tackle a project like that? I'm not a tech person. Thanks for the well wishes.
Kevin Martin
2024-12-19 23:16:01 +0000 UTCLets make a deal, If someday in our lifetime (unlikely) this happens, and it leads to hypergamy and moms cheating their biological clocks on sperm banks, I'll have a drink on your name. If it leads to lower paternity fraud, less alimony fraud, less single moms and men calling the shots on the terms of relationships, then you have a drink on me
Jimmy Madrigal
2024-12-19 23:01:12 +0000 UTC@Kevin Martin - I TRULY wish you all the best. BTW, are your protocols based on diagnosing INDIVIDUAL physiological, metabolic and digestive systems in order to prescribe TAILORED regimens? Ironically, I think AI can be a VERY useful analytical tool at this stage.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 22:57:08 +0000 UTCThat's interesting. Yeah, I suppose I could get AI to do the postures, but it's a hell of a lot easier to just turn on a camera and do them. I meant to express the originality of my system being something I don't think AI could come up with by analyzing a bunch of yoga systems for digestive illnesses(my specialty). A lot of my system isn't technically yoga, or any system of exercise I'm aware of. A decent amount of my system is stuff I came up with over decades of digestive distress and observation. Even what I do borrow from other systems is not typically used for digestive issues per se. I've adjusted it. I don't doubt that in the distant future even that could change. But, as Alexander points out, I think I've got a few years before AI can make up a yoga course that can replace the one in my head based on 25 years of personal observations which often don't align with any exercises for digestion I've come across.
Kevin Martin
2024-12-19 21:59:33 +0000 UTC@Kevin Martin - There are already VERY successful AI "virtual inlfuencers". Why do you think video footage of people demonstrating things will be particularly hard to replace? 🤷♂️ Lu do Magalu: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuLGz2ZLLeo Lil Miquela: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bn3tUUtj2M Imma: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s586r8PMlSk Rae: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5Fy6jmGa1A There are even HOW TO videos on how to create one of your own: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky5ZB-mqZKM
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 20:15:01 +0000 UTC@Jimmy Madrigal - Ah, I see. But I'm skeptical as to how exactly this would benefit MEN over WOMEN -- after all there ARE (and will continue to be) sperm banks. Seems like it would only make Hypergamy WORSE. 💁♂️
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 19:59:23 +0000 UTC@Steven - One mans' utopia is another woman's dystopia, and vice versa -- don't nap or you might miss it! 😆
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 19:29:06 +0000 UTC@Jason - No, I mean things like Microsoft's Power Platform (eg. PowerApps), Salesforce's Lightning Platform, Amazon's Honeycode and Amplify, as well as Google's AppSheet.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 19:25:56 +0000 UTCNope, if that was the case pills would not have been a driver for women like Jordan Peterson said. The reason is distance. With condoms, both always know its being used, and both have the decision on whether to use or not. With the pill the control is on one person. A woman can hide from you that she is on the pill, that gives her control, that's why is a game changer. We don't have that for men, except for a permanent vasectomy
Jimmy Madrigal
2024-12-19 18:26:34 +0000 UTCI assume you mean like basic web development such as HTML which is kinda funny because the sites like Wordpress are useless if you don’t want a cookie cutter website.
Jason
2024-12-19 17:56:19 +0000 UTC@Jimmy Madrigal - Isn't that what condoms are?
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 17:51:24 +0000 UTC@Jason - Low level programming was going away LONG before AI became a thing, with low-code and no-code -- it might take a while for it to reach the REALLY high-hanging fruit, but it will get there soon enough.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 17:48:21 +0000 UTC@Jay Ronnert - Time to book your flight on the Starship ride!
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 17:05:34 +0000 UTC@Cristian - And Tesla has a LOT of serious competition these days, especially from China. "I, Robot" is coming FAST, ready or not!
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 17:04:44 +0000 UTC@Cezary Skoczek - Trump hates BOTH parties (and they hate HIM) -- he just had to adopt ONE! 😉
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 17:02:41 +0000 UTCCapitulation. There has been so much capitulation. Wake me up when we reach the utopia.
Steven
2024-12-19 15:19:50 +0000 UTCI don’t think coding as a career will go away as a career for a while. ChatGPT using coding forms to generate code it doesn’t understand how coding actually works it uses humans who program as its source of truth for the right way to program. I do think that in like 30 years we may have some kind of advancement that will make it no longer necessary for humans to program but that leads to other issues such as not knowing what the machine has for programming which can cause massive issues. Basically if a person doesn’t proof read the code then there will be an issue with the product.
Jason
2024-12-19 14:48:03 +0000 UTCBirth control for men, that would be a huge technological game changer
Jimmy Madrigal
2024-12-19 13:38:55 +0000 UTCDon't know if you've heard the phrase "Great Filter" but listening to this reminds me that it might be a point where we may go extinct as a species...
Jay Ronnert
2024-12-19 13:18:55 +0000 UTCwith the humanoid robot field improving very fast as of recently, in ten years time blue collar jobs will probably start to faces massive amount of layoffs and replacement. No job is really safe at this point imo... just look at the impressive improvement of the Tesla optimus bot in the last year and it's just keep getting better day after day.
Cristian
2024-12-19 10:07:00 +0000 UTCDo you mean he didn't won republican primary and didn't candidate from republicana mandate? XD
Cezary Skoczek
2024-12-19 08:55:22 +0000 UTC@Cezary Skoczek - Trump is not a Republican -- he is a "Bull in a China Shop".
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 08:11:01 +0000 UTCAnd that proves what exactly? One republican win means democrats will never return to office? Or that policy never changes? Or maybe shiffting in circummstances does not shift voting patterns?
Cezary Skoczek
2024-12-19 08:06:49 +0000 UTC@Cezary Skoczek - This "bigger voting block" just voted for Trump -- not the "boss babes", not the "graduates of Bullsh*t University", not the 4-B's ... Who knows, the "silent majority" may be finding their voice at last. 💁♂️
Joseph Omega
2024-12-19 08:02:07 +0000 UTCWomen are the bigger voting block so they will push for UBI. The question is if men will finance it. Neither AI nor automation will be advanced enough to replace the majority of work in the coming decades, but the recession will reap most of the bullshit jobs. Fun decade ahead.
Cezary Skoczek
2024-12-19 07:08:04 +0000 UTCA book “bullshit jobs” goes well into this new economy. Summary video too online.
Lilac bush
2024-12-19 06:40:44 +0000 UTCBelieve it or not, there are still two US states where it is against the law to pump your own gas. There has always been the fear that technology will eliminate all work, but something new always comes along. It is true that there are many unneeded useless jobs, including 80% of those at the old Twitter. It is also true that many of those jobs will disappear in an economic downturn. The majority of useless degrees and useless jobs are done by women, so more women will be affected when layoffs and downsizing happens. The changes in the labor market seem to be happening faster and faster, and there will always be fits and starts, but overall change usually happens at an evolutionary pace, not a revolutionary one.
Eric Linden
2024-12-19 05:40:27 +0000 UTCI'm wondering how blogging and book writing will change. I just got a course on how to use chatgpt to improve my blogging and make it quicker. I got another course on book writing as well. One thing I plan to offer in the future are yoga workshops with my unique style. I don't think AI can take that away anytime soon. Courses on a website involving video footage of people demonstarting things (like yoga postures) will also be harder to replace....I hope.
Kevin Martin
2024-12-19 05:15:32 +0000 UTCI respectfully disagree re. the return to full time homemaker status. A lot of women who did that resented it, in the day when there was really no alternative. Women who now return to traditional roles will in many cases, resent it. Sure, their attitude might change. But my hunch is that they will subtly resent children, as a necessary "evil." I don't want to think of the consequences of that. And those who want to stay in professions, etc., will be competing with men in those professions or with AI. Ironically, that last bit will mean it's no longer gender v. gender, but every "man" for himself. My grand-nephew has zero interest in college, and wants to be a welder. The family looked down on that when he was 15. I think we're going to end up thinking him lucky in not being caught up in the desire for status.
David Ronin
2024-12-19 03:14:14 +0000 UTCI think there will be a massive shake up and many white collar will try to jump to anything resembling white collar in blue collar sectors. Women will still receive preferential treatment in the hiring process for manual and non-manual labor jobs, but there will be less of them to go around. I also predict when it gets to the point that some form of universal income is necessary or adopted earlier that women will get even worse about hypergamy since they have more time to spend sifting through their options and men have more time to cope with this new reality. If they work to level up, they could be one of the guys women are ok picking just to have a second income around and to do some of the tasks robots don't do or come at some kind of premium - sometimes for life, other times for right now. Basically we are still in the same situation where 80% of women reproduce and 40% of men do also. With advances in fertility and gene selection processes, this may change also. Another thing to consider is any government big enough to give you everything you need/want is also big enough to take it all away so we need to be aware of the very real possibility of euthanasia on a broad scale in all of the ways that can take place. May God help us in this next technological revolution.
Ryan Carlow
2024-12-19 02:59:24 +0000 UTC
