PATREON EXCLUSIVE (Full Video): Women believe they are inferior
Added 2024-11-16 07:00:02 +0000 UTC
Comments
@Arthur Eagle - So you consider her comment "low value"?
Joseph Omega
2024-12-04 22:51:39 +0000 UTC@Bill Washinski - "Equality does not exist." This is STRICTLY correct, yet "Equivalency" DOES exist: Like "electrons and protons", "crests and troughs", "fire and water", "locks and keys", "predators and prey", "swords and shields" ... "yin and yang." None "better" and none "worse". We are a perfectly DIMORPHIC species, born in EQUAL numbers. I prefer NOT to use our current (Feminist) "master's" tools to dismantle their house.
Joseph Omega
2024-12-04 22:44:44 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - The problem often is that the measure of a man's ambition and competence is usually determined by their income and accomplishments. How do you deal with any inconsistencies?
Joseph Omega
2024-11-29 23:11:40 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - Much of your generality about "women always contributing financially" depends on the definition of "financially". It NORMALLY refers specifically to "monetarily". I suspect you may be using it in a wider context. Also, "It’s only for a very brief time around World War II that there were nonworking housewives", seems factually incorrect -- it was PRECISELY the OPPOSITE which established the "Rosie the Riveter" archetype: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosie_the_Riveter Perhaps a typo?
Joseph Omega
2024-11-29 23:07:51 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden To what extent do you think this applies to modern day relationships? Even on AG's channel we see the quote, "His money is our money and my money is my money" doing rounds.
Ashwin Srinivas
2024-11-27 01:07:01 +0000 UTC@JO I should probably clarify by very dominant I mean that I have the potential for high dominance, but have learned how to use it and I nearly always naturally submit to people I respect. I have a strong appreciation for hierarchy and the chain of command, which necessitates knowing one’s role and behaving appropriately. The sexual question is easily answered because it’s like an automatic switch over which I have no control. In non-sexual situations there is at least some low-level processing occurring that determines how dominantly I behave. But other than initiating sex (in a direct yet feminine way, I’d argue), I have no desire to take charge in bed and it has never happened. Once it’s been established that sex will happen, he takes the reins (even if it’s merely following what has been discussed at other times as to what I would like to (not) occur, as was the case with my sexually submissive husband). Although I’m still not a pushover and won’t do anything I’m uncomfortable with, ofc. I think those are both perverse manifestations of disordered, possibly mentally deformed and likely badly parented people. I think there is some naturally occurring homosexuality in men but I think most paraphilia are learned behaviours, often in response to trauma.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-11-26 20:32:30 +0000 UTCI’ve never heard of such things happening in reality let alone seen them for myself. But I have also not spent any time in Latin America.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-11-26 20:16:49 +0000 UTCMost women have nearly always contributed financially. It’s only for a very brief time around World War II that there were nonworking housewives. It is in fact the historical norm for women to work; it’s just normally they work from the home and for their husband/family, or at least locally. Agreed on the rest.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-11-26 20:14:30 +0000 UTCI'm all for women penetrating these male-dominated fields and men penetrating female dominated fields too. But as long as there is no power struggle that ensues, all will be well. I think we need to focus on that and understanding and appreciating gender roles and differences is the way forward. That high achieving boss babe will have no problems dating if she brings her femininity to the relationship and not engage in power struggles with her partner. And while hypergamy is real, what that means for the guy is that he needs to be doing something with his life that gives her a chance to admire and respect him. It could even be slightly lower than her own achievements, but he can't be a stay-at-home dad expecting a strong woman to come and do everything for him. And women making financial contributions to long term relationships and the family itself is also a thing that must become accepted and possibly even expected. It doesn't have to be even split but there must be some contribution. In this day and age, that really helps. Otherwise, if the man doesn't have access to that money, women shouldn't be surprised that we don't value their degrees and accomplishments.
Ashwin Srinivas
2024-11-26 18:38:58 +0000 UTCEspecially coming from her I was taken aback, because she's usually on point and high value, whereas this is more something you might expect a low value woman to say (in a world where women didn't always lie through their teeth, that is).
Arthur Eagle
2024-11-26 12:11:19 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - How do you segment yourself between sexual and non-sexual domination? What did you think of the concepts of Autogynephilia and Autoandrophilia?
Joseph Omega
2024-11-25 19:43:33 +0000 UTCIt’s never been an issue when I have more money &/or earn more than a man - but he MUST be at least as ambitious & competent as I am, & be accomplishing things I value.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-11-25 15:41:10 +0000 UTCIt’s definitely suboptimal, and I’m a very dominant woman (not sexually, but overall). I don’t think it’s ever truly healthy for men to be sexually submissive or women to be sexually dominant.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-11-25 15:38:18 +0000 UTCI will certainly encourage my daughters to be highly feminine & do my best to model the behaviour I think is most essential for females to thrive. Same for my sons, and their father modeling ideal male behaviour.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-11-25 15:34:07 +0000 UTC@Peter - I understand your logical reasoning, but I feel it may be best if the word "Feminism" itself be made to evolve and become consciously redefined INTERNALLY among those long invested in it -- a "rebranding" from within, so to speak. It is inevitable that I would ask ChatGPT for its input: https://chatgpt.com/share/67406573-8420-800a-a5bd-0465e95b81e6 What do you think?
Joseph Omega
2024-11-22 11:09:14 +0000 UTC@J O: I would enjoy then not even using the word feminism. Can we finally just get- merit “ism” . The merit of your situation, your character, your person. I haven’t formed a good answer what I’d replace feminism with that still addresses issues faced by women. Not many in the west, but in some places take an extreme, Afghanistan, there are legit issues.
Peter
2024-11-22 03:25:44 +0000 UTCEquality does not exist. Life is a competition; and there are winners & losers. I’ve told women say I’m better than you; period.
Bill Washinski
2024-11-21 22:06:49 +0000 UTC@Arthur Eagle - Well, there IS such a thing as "Christian Feminism": https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_feminism Still, the "Fifth Wave Feminism" I envision (and hope for) is the one that finally washes away all the others, and puts our culture back on track with its reality. I've heard it referred to as "Cultural Feminism": https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_feminism
Joseph Omega
2024-11-21 04:29:25 +0000 UTCYoooooo that’s kinda wild. I get what she means but using the word misogynistic for that is kinda wild
Peter
2024-11-21 03:48:50 +0000 UTCNot really relevant to my comment (especially since Lexigirl is a Christian), but to your comment, the only wave I'm interested in is a wave goodbye lol. It's hilarious how women are now shaving their heads in protest to Trump etc, which is really just (subconsciously) trying to reinforce their delusion that men wanted them in the first place... Even young women are laughing at this travesty, because people (especially women), need detached objectivity (which females are virtually incapable of cultivating themselves) to recognize truths their Self-serving Bias would ordinarily blind them to.
Arthur Eagle
2024-11-20 06:20:37 +0000 UTCMore tales from my favorite ditzy podcaster: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tJ8wtezF2s -and- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJHxy2zcVgo
Joseph Omega
2024-11-19 23:20:35 +0000 UTC@Arthur Eagle - Seems women are just beginning to exercise their "prerogative to change their minds" (back) again. No biggie, but hopefully a sign of "Fifth Wave Feminism". 💁♂️
Joseph Omega
2024-11-19 23:18:24 +0000 UTCCheck out the YT Short of this girl I follow actually recommending misogyny... Funnily enough, just the other day I replied to the typical misogynist comment on Quora that I'll take that as a compliment, since misogynists get the girls... https://youtube.com/shorts/SO-mYtgfpMs?si=B-IsGuwHzJRHz-7S
Arthur Eagle
2024-11-19 10:30:23 +0000 UTCThis phrase about cheering girls when them they do boy things brought out a doubt that I have on the education of girls. I'll take the opportunity to ask for external opinions, especially from the parents among you. What is the best approach with daughters: actively prepare her for girly things and attitude, or let her discover herself so that she naturally finds out that she likes girly things (at least, most likely scenario) ?
Galdor
2024-11-18 21:13:43 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden & @Peter - As I implied in the main thread, I think this unilateral view of Hypergamy IS naive: Both men AND women ARE hypergamous, but with respect to DIFFERENT power dimensions -- hard power hypergamy for women and soft power hypergamy for men. This seems yet another oversimplification of the gender dynamic narrative -- like in the use of the term "equality' (as opposed to the more accurate term "equivalency"). This suggests that since the ascendency of modern feminism, men have been increasingly forced to "marry/date down" to increasingly less "softly superior" (read less "pure" or more promiscuous and aggressive) mates, while women have not been forced to make the complementary sacrifice.
Joseph Omega
2024-11-18 18:51:12 +0000 UTCBut despite my objecting to the format. By definition you can’t look up at something with being below it. And that over you something by definition has to look down. So this social media big brain arguments up women proclaiming to look for someone above or atleast equal (let the silly dominance fights begin) and anything equality.. the math ain’t mathing.. But i honestly don’t know how many women ACTUALLY think in these terms in the real world… In my experience they talk to me about attraction, less their qualities and stuff. It’s a bit superficial but there doesn’t seem to be a conscious discrimination… I suspect I may be horribly niaeve but I’m just sharing my experiences
Peter
2024-11-17 10:34:16 +0000 UTCI’m really missing the days of patreon content and not these yt click bait topics with patreon funnel 5 min Tak on.
Peter
2024-11-17 10:27:53 +0000 UTCUh really? I’m sure you knew it but not like consciously KNEW it You surely know the example that a woman will only date someone at her level or above her, while the man will happily date a McDonald’s worker By definition of you being someone, a woman can look up to do you have to be in a higher position and therefore HAVE TO look down words . otherwise you’re just looking air above her head Not saying you should look down on a woman, but hopefully you know what I mean
Peter
2024-11-17 10:20:32 +0000 UTCI remember when Alex made an effort to make a list of non-Clickbait video links. That’s another life time
Peter
2024-11-17 10:17:14 +0000 UTC@Jimmy Madrigal - Given the opportunity, there would always be those who abuse their power, whether males in a "macho culture" such as the one you describe, or females in a "Matriarchal-controlled Patriarchy" culture such as currently exists in most societies in the "West". Ironically, PERCEIVED POWERLESSNESS in the face of a higher authoritarian boogeyman is often the cause (can't speak for Costa Rica, but the "Patriarchy" is the usual culprit of choice in the modern "West"). When a feeling of security and "spiritual autonomy" is restored, those granted power (hard OR soft) have little need to overtly display it. I don't think it is necessarilly connected to "traditional gender roles".
Joseph Omega
2024-11-17 03:37:34 +0000 UTCIn our country it was common even on my young age. I remember, when I was little, my uncle being very chauvinistic around my aunt, in a household where he was the breadwinner and she took care of the kids. I never knew he hit her, but it was quite humiliating for her. Same with another family members and friends, in a larger or lower degree. That is first hand and it was common. Now from "family tales", my grandmother had to fight against my grandfather so my mom could go to collage, that was 57 years ago, because it was not common that girls went to collage back then. And my uncles demanded (not asked) their sisters to iron their shirt because it was a woman's job. This is of course not first hand but has been confirmed by several family members. Stories like that have been around me for a long time. So in my mind, when in traditional roles, some men where kind of jerks as well (Not all, but enough to be a precedent). I do not know how often it was in other cultures.
Jimmy Madrigal
2024-11-16 20:39:19 +0000 UTC@Jimmy Madrigal - Ah. So, an aspect of the classic Latin "macho culture" I've heard about. I don't get the impression that such overt bravado was ever as common in the cultures up north -- but before my time. Anglo cultures seemed more into "taming shrews" than anything else.
Joseph Omega
2024-11-16 20:18:41 +0000 UTCFrom family, friends and also first hand. Be aware that I im from a latin american country, Costa Rica, and that was actually common, 30 years ago.
Jimmy Madrigal
2024-11-16 18:45:14 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I suspect the fantasy is not always so much that men are being dominated by women, as much as they fanstasize that women are so helplessly and hopelessly sexually drawn to them that they are compelled to attack them to satisfy their needs -- the turn on being a variant of the stereotypical male one of nymphomania. Additionally, there may also be the phenomenon of Autogynephilia, with its complex layers of eroticism: https://chatgpt.com/share/6738e5dd-b92c-800a-98f5-4bec0536520f. On the flip side, I imagine that some women fantasize their own "soft power" prowess in the extreme, such that any and all men can be made to bend to their power -- remember that a dominatrix is ALWAYS ultrasexually clad. So too are many if not MOST superheroines, kicking (mostly male) butt and taking names (admittedly, likely to be more a male fantasy than a female one). One can also imagine Autoandrophilia, what Freud may have been tempted to call "penis envy", but its applicability to erotic scenarios seems a bit sketchy. Still it would certainly account for many of the more extreme Feminist Ideologies.
Joseph Omega
2024-11-16 18:17:54 +0000 UTC@Jimmy Madrigal - But WHERE did these stories originate? WHO told them to you? They ARE called "old wives' tales" for a reason.
Joseph Omega
2024-11-16 18:02:30 +0000 UTCNever realized I was “dating down” all this time.
Eric Linden
2024-11-16 17:04:52 +0000 UTCI like to learn from this videos. There is a topic that I would like you Alexander to touch. When I was young I heard a lot of stories of men abusing their power in the relationships as well, like making fun of women because they did not drive, or play sports as good as them. Comanding them to iron their shirt or blaming them for being in the house all day while they work. I don't hear about that any more because gender roles have change and now I hear women acting the way you describe in this video. What I'm trying to say is if we manage to go back to traditional roles, there will also be an abuse from men again because maybe is in human nature to be onesided. So in summary men did look down on women when they had the power, I believe.
Jimmy Madrigal
2024-11-16 14:15:24 +0000 UTCMen often fantasize about being dominated by a woman. It’s part of many movies. Big turn on for men. What does this fantasy do for women?
Eric Linden
2024-11-16 14:00:02 +0000 UTCAlso they do get alimony, house, government support in case if marriage breaks, the whole system is designed to support women, men do not have this support and thus they go homeless etc.
2024-11-16 10:41:11 +0000 UTCCouple goes to college together, dating, living together, then marrying. Woman works part time job while in college. Man works three jobs at a time all throughout college. They graduate. Woman’s career makes more money than man’s. They soon have two kids. Woman loses interest and starts cheating. Marriage breaks up. Can anyone relate?
Eric Linden
2024-11-16 08:55:37 +0000 UTCWell, better late than never Alexander. This ChatGPT conversation (https://chatgpt.com/share/671ffacc-8aac-800a-9e19-f7894ccb993a) is a bit long, but walks through the rationale, from the point that exposes the inherent contradiction in Feminist Ideology (with its professed emphasis on "gender equality") and its casual widespread justification and acceptance of Female Hypergamy, all the way through to the following logical conclusion: "While men might not traditionally seek hard power superiority in women, they could be said to exhibit hypergamy in relation to soft power. This hypergamy seeks women who are perceived as superior in areas of emotional, moral, and relational influence. It complements the traditional understanding of female hypergamy by showing that men, too, can pursue partners who excel in areas that provide them with value and support within a relationship. "This nuanced perspective helps explain why relationships can be destabilized when traditional gender roles are reversed or when the balance of hard and soft power shifts. It suggests that both men and women have hypergamous tendencies, but they express them in ways that align with their evolutionary and social roles—hard power for women seeking men, and soft power for men seeking women."
Joseph Omega
2024-11-16 08:27:49 +0000 UTC
