PATREON EXCLUSIVE (Full Video): If Women focus on men their quality improves
Added 2024-10-27 05:07:00 +0000 UTC
Comments
I fell for a woman with NPD. I won't bore you with the horrific details but she was very sweet for at least a couple of years. Then her mask gradually started slipping. How do you snatch one up when you need to date for a significant period of time to spot these people? She was really really good at her game. And I am a very aware, man, in the psychology field, and I did not spot it. She has been a narcissist since the age of five years old, so she had much more experience than me in playing the game.
warren beane
2024-11-16 18:46:44 +0000 UTC@ATH-YF - Passionately and elegantly said.
Joseph Omega
2024-11-11 18:29:42 +0000 UTC@ATH-YF - Actually your view seems very consistent with the AI's. It is just that the latter places no moral or ethical judgement on the predilection for modern religions to adopt secular value systems -- what you call an "attack on the spiritual link". Still, your correlation between the dissolution of ideas of freewill and the reduction of individual responsibility is sound.
Joseph Omega
2024-11-11 18:25:14 +0000 UTCThe Ai response is indeed very telling but what the Ai misses is the attack on the spiritual link and violation of the sacred principle of Freewill along side the inseparable consideration of individual responsibility. All the enslaving governments we have on planet are designed to break humanity sense of identity and the inner knowing of Common Sense in the healthy humans still left. They want to tell the masses what should be the focus of life as if we are Sims NPCs in a video game. They have convinced everyone that : (1) we cannot be responsible for ourselves and are a weak ass race, (2) the direction of the future is up to the few most corrupted peoples to decide, (3) we should give consent for creating our own enslavement instead of coming with Truth-Love Based solutions that will put their soulless dystopia vision to shame (4) it should be ok to force traumatic shifts in everyone's lifes 'for the greater good' like sending peoples to wars or adopting satanic ideologies or creating more pointless divisions. (5) human biology should be considered outdated with incoming new tech (the biggest lie and the most dangerous one) (6) there is nothing above the 5 senses to worry about and the higher aspects of self don't exist (7) our past history is the one we've been told by the controlled institutions (8) there's no consequences for wrong doings after this life ends
ATH-YF
2024-11-07 16:48:00 +0000 UTCAgain, not exactly directly related to this video's topic but, despite the fact that it STILL produced a response, there seems to be SOMETHING about the following interaction with ChatGPT that was deemed to have violated its content policies, such that I was unable to provide the usual shared link to it - Me: I get the impression that among humans, women are the ones with elaborate or exaggerated traits to attract males. ChatGPT: You're absolutely right, and that's a fascinating insight! In humans, women often exhibit traits that are exaggerated or more elaborate as part of sexual selection, which is somewhat unusual compared to many other species where males are the ones with flamboyant features. Here’s how these traits manifest: Physical Traits in Women that Act as Signals: 1. Facial Neoteny: Women often have facial features that emphasize neotenous (youthful) characteristics like large eyes, full lips, and smooth skin. These features are often considered attractive as they signal youth, health, and fertility, all of which are biologically desirable traits for reproductive success. 2. Body Shape and Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR): Women’s body fat distribution typically creates a more pronounced hourglass shape, with a lower WHR (around 0.7 being optimal for perceived attractiveness). This shape is not just visually distinctive but also signals fertility, as studies show that a lower WHR is often associated with reproductive health. 3. Breast Development: Human females have uniquely prominent breasts even outside of lactation, which is rare among mammals. Prominent breasts may serve as an attractive trait linked to fertility and nurturing capacity. Unlike in most species where breasts enlarge only during lactation, human females develop breasts at puberty, suggesting a role in sexual selection. 4. Fuller Lips and Facial Symmetry: Fuller lips are often seen as an attractive trait, likely because they signify health and youth. Additionally, facial symmetry in women is often associated with attractiveness, as it may signal good genes and developmental stability. 5. Skin Quality: Women tend to have smoother and lighter skin than men, which often indicates youth and health. This is not merely a result of social standards but an evolved preference, as men are biologically inclined to favor signals of health and fertility. 6. Hair Quality and Length: Long, healthy hair can be an indicator of nutritional status and overall health. In many cultures, long, well-kept hair is a trait that enhances attractiveness in women, likely because it serves as a visible indicator of vitality and reproductive health. 7. Higher-Pitched Voice: Women generally have higher-pitched voices, which can be perceived as youthful and attractive. This vocal quality may subconsciously signal femininity and reproductive potential to men. Behavioral and Social Traits: 1. Social and Emotional Skills: Women often display high levels of social and emotional intelligence, which can enhance their attractiveness by facilitating deeper connections and emotional bonds. These social skills can make them appealing mates and effective caregivers, traits highly valued in long-term partnerships. 2. Self-Presentation and Grooming: Across cultures, women often engage more in grooming behaviors, cosmetics, and adornments like jewelry. While this may be influenced by societal norms, it also amplifies natural features (like smooth skin and pronounced eyes), adding to their attractiveness. 3. Neoteny in Behavior: Certain behaviors or expressions associated with warmth, agreeableness, and approachability can increase attractiveness, similar to the "cute" appeal that neotenous physical traits provide. Why Are These Traits Exaggerated in Women? The elaboration of these traits in women may stem from an evolutionary focus on fertility signals. Unlike males, where strength and resource-acquisition skills play a significant role, female attractiveness often centers around traits that emphasize health, reproductive potential, and nurturing ability. Since women bear a greater biological cost in reproduction (gestation, childbirth, and often more involvement in early child-rearing), their attractiveness signals have evolved to maximize their chances of securing a committed partner who can provide resources and support. In Summary: Yes, human women exhibit a range of elaborate and exaggerated traits—in their physical appearance, behaviors, and self-presentation—that can serve as visual and social signals of attractiveness. Unlike in many animal species where males compete more visibly for female attention, in humans, women’s traits have evolved to attract male partners as part of complex, mutual mate selection processes.
Joseph Omega
2024-11-01 06:29:19 +0000 UTC@Hyperion - How I wish that you were wrong, but fear that you may be right.
Joseph Omega
2024-11-01 06:23:02 +0000 UTC@Louis - I don't know, but, just as you state, there is always a significant disconnect between what women like to SAY and ACT as if they want, and what their visceral actions (and often even their impulsive WORDS) suggest they REALLY crave: Very many women often ANGRILY state that males should "man-up" (when they are being charitable, otherwise: https://chatgpt.com/share/671421fc-a3c4-800a-82bb-e2b9070834d7), suggesting OTHER than the OFFICIAL Feminist Doctrine condemning "toxicity" -- they have NEVER even sought to fully account for the remarkable success of "Chads" and the top 5% of Christian Greys. In my experience "I hate you!" is more often a childish cry for help than any real reflection of genuine dislike for traditional masculinity. I suspect that they are not deciding to be alone by CHOICE, but more by FASHION.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-31 18:59:46 +0000 UTC@Louis - "Never" is a LONG time -- things change and women (collectively and individually) are NOTORIOUS for their "prerogative to change their minds", ESPECIALLY if it is FASHIONABLE to do so (a la social contagion). I have faith they will eventually all come to their senses, just not sure if it will be in our lifetime, but hopefully BEFORE our civilization collapses under their petulant and self-indulgent stewardship.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-31 18:49:57 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - Well, I'm guessing that PARTIAL tests ARE possible, like under-representating one's income or over-representing one's illness or infirmity. Still, this level of inauthenticity may call for a degree of one's "inner female" that can run significantly counter to one's natural male sense of honor and pride, working to significantly undermine them.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-31 01:03:11 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega- If there is a way to truly test it, definitely do it. It’s happened to me and I’ve seen it happen to many others.
Eric Linden
2024-10-31 00:25:06 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - More like "PRETEND to lose their job and FEIGN illness or incapacity" I should think, otherwise risking the resultant potential dangers to be less injurous than the attempts at a cure.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-30 22:08:08 +0000 UTC@Peter & @Eric Linden - I don't mind talking to ChatGPT -- often it is like a dialogue with a highly intelligent child (or, ironically, woman?) where much patience and compassion is required to mitigate the paucity of its upbringing and cultural nurturing (read, "training data"). Eventually, I've found, it DOES come around. For background into the topics surrounding innate female characteristics, you may be interested in these other conversations that I've previously had with ChatGPT - "Lordosis Behavior and Neoteny in Mammals" (v3.5): https://chatgpt.com/share/6722a694-8e54-800a-b91c-4658dac421ca "Neoteny and Mate Selection" (v4o): https://chatgpt.com/share/6722a3dc-aacc-800a-a95c-165465aad53d "Evolutionary Perspective on Women" (v4o - VERY long and VERY controversial -- I'm actually surprised that I did not violate ChatGPT content guidelines at any point): https://chatgpt.com/share/6722a882-d404-800a-8f51-fd6b26867141
Joseph Omega
2024-10-30 22:02:41 +0000 UTCWomen shit test men constantly; but men need to do a major shit test on women before entering into something permanent. Men need to lose their job, spend two weeks in the hospital, or go through a major surgery to see if their woman can handle going into the masculine role on a temporary basis. That is the point where the marriage goes bad, the dead bedroom goes completely dead, or the marriage simply ends. Men need to be masculine and women feminine in normal circumstances, but they need to be able to switch roles on a temporary basis when the “for better for worse, richer or poorer” happens. I’ve seen many men completely take over cooking, cleaning, child nurturing, and other responsibilities when things go bad for the woman, and it never threatens the marriage. It might actually improve the relationship. The same can’t be said when the roles are reversed.
Eric Linden
2024-10-30 13:24:32 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega - It seems both feminism and ChatGPT acknowledge physical neotenous traits, but deny the non-physical ones.
Eric Linden
2024-10-30 12:39:54 +0000 UTCI find the discussion a bit wild , like its a litteral talking book. But its responces are just as limited as i would imagine. They are not intuitive or human. I dont mind that. Interactive book it is. Does got challenge your perspective at all? Underpinning it’s argument in a conversation approach manner? Like if you’re talking to a german, speak german. Speaking to ro man, speak RP.. etc
Peter
2024-10-30 12:18:33 +0000 UTCThis is not exactly directly related to this video's topic, but I thought you guys may be VERY interested in this FASCINATING discussion I had with ChatGPT on the topic of Feminism's take on the universally defining existence of Neotenous (child-like) traits of women relative to men: https://chatgpt.com/share/6721ffbc-ec88-800a-a8ab-39f6600ed0ab If it were not so utterly tragic, it would be intensely FUNNY! 😂
Joseph Omega
2024-10-30 09:50:51 +0000 UTCLike at work I see this all the time(as I work for a large organization). Older women put in management position where they lead with their emotions with their heads all over the place and do a horrible job as a leader. They end up being toxic micromanagers/dictators. Like hey, I would be entirely fine if I would have a female boss who would be able to show proper leadership, accountability and responsibility. My problem is just that the vast majority of female bosses I have had were completely incapable of displaying this in their roles. These women were leading with their emotions and trying to add their "caring" flavor into their leadership, which made it incredible toxic and incompetent. I honestly feel at work my career progression is bottleneck by people like this. I see these women in the bottom end of what I talked earlier. Most of them are single and divorced too. I can guarantee you they would never ever give their position of power/responsibility and money to back to a more feminine role such as being a caring grandmother, if we take into account their age.
Louis
2024-10-29 12:55:57 +0000 UTCNobody wants to admit it, but the vast majority of women out there are not and will never be high quality material. Sadly there is no going back and a lot more men than in the past just won't find any decent woman to partner up with. 5% maybe of women are high quality material, but competition is exponentially higher. It's on the housing market a granny's bungalow made in the 50s. Back then it was worth less than $100k. Now it is worth millions. And GOOD LUCK trying to snatch one for $300k. All about supply and demand.
Louis
2024-10-29 12:30:56 +0000 UTCThis is BS. I can honestly say that I always have had this frame(of a masculine man). And although some women will respect this(like a fit body), it won't land you a girlfriend. My problem is also that I am introverted and it bodes extremely poorly with the role of being a man. But like I was saying, in 2024, very few women care about a masculine man and I don't think anything can change this. Maybe just 5% of women out there do care(and like Alex said they're all already taken) and the rest are either rotten delusional IG/social media chicks or boss babes. ACTIONS speak LOUDER THAN WORDS. You don't see the 2 latter ending up in a high quality relationship with a man cause they just don't want one. And probably can't have one too.
Louis
2024-10-29 12:06:42 +0000 UTC@Hermann, no, I should think not pushing back at work has nothing to do with courage. There is a time and a place for push-backs, and it is seldom at work or on social media. The government, the mainstream media, and social media mobs are the biggest bullies of our times. Be very careful what you say at work or online. IMO people should keep their causes and opinions to themselves at work and on social media. Too many people speak because they simply have to say something to get attention and validation, not because they have something worthwhile to say. When ideology or emotions supersede reason, we have failure in communication. I vote conscientiously with my dollars, my time, and ballot. And on occasion, I may engage in civil discourse only with sensible minded persons. There is little to gain but lots to lose when confronted with ideologically possessed.
Hyperion
2024-10-29 00:43:04 +0000 UTC@Hermann - As is often pointed out, a Feminist Worldview and a Feminine Worldview are entirely different things, and more often than not, in direct CONTRADICTION to each other. And because the latter is inherently less (hard) power hungry than the former, they are not all that inspired to call out, shame and marginalize them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL3Hrwg3A3w
Joseph Omega
2024-10-28 22:18:37 +0000 UTC@Hermann - So true. To paraphrase: "For what shall it profit a man if he shall regain his authenticity, and suffer the loss of his own livelihood?"
Joseph Omega
2024-10-28 21:16:28 +0000 UTCIt's fascinating to me how different people see the world. I think it is partly our fault: I've often met activist women, particularly at work, who truly cannot understand how anyone could object to their cause. Or why so few men are joining their ranks. I always think to myself: Well, I could tell you. But then I may loose my job and reputation, so I usually just shut up or push back only very slightly and carefully. Not very brave, I know. And I have started to open up a bit and push back more. Setting your boundaries is important, after all. But you need to be careful at work.
Hermann
2024-10-28 20:54:11 +0000 UTCYou know, I do have a pretty good life at this point. It just feels like I'm missing out on something important. But at the same time I am hesitant to let someone into my life and mess it up. I have seen it too many times, and also I just have no energy or patience for these games. Maybe, one day I'll meet someone who I actually like and enjoy being with. It just doesn't feel like it right now. That's probably another issue: Being alone too long makes you a bit excentric. When listening to most people, particularly women, I have a hard time to relate with their experience and worldview.
Hermann
2024-10-28 20:41:14 +0000 UTC@Hyperion - Ah, "Chesterton's Fence.". 👍👍
Joseph Omega
2024-10-28 17:08:08 +0000 UTCIf you look into long standing cultures that last -- Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Confusion/Daoist, Hindi, etc., they all put strong emphasis on family and purpose, and put men as the head of the family. The progressives, especially the feminists, are quick to label tradition as oppression, not knowing that traditions are social experiments across generations and eons that worked. If one saw a fence on a prairie, before tearing it down thoughtlessly, it would do one well to understand for what reason it had been put there in the first place. Progress simply for progress's sake is misguided at best, devastating and catastrophic for society at worst.
Hyperion
2024-10-28 00:29:50 +0000 UTC@Hyperion - Nicely put. 👍 Unfortunately in the minds of many men, desperate times breed desperate measures. Short-sighted, but true.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-27 23:20:00 +0000 UTC"We want standards that suite us, not ones that are fair. That means we get to be whatever we want while you have to be whatever we want you to be. Oh yeah, you can't shame us, but we can shame the shit out of you. And if you don't support us, you are all types of '-isms' and '-ists'." Only a cuck of a man would every agree to this. I'd say the only thing more off-putting than a strident feminist is a male feminist.
Hyperion
2024-10-27 20:41:30 +0000 UTC@ATH-YF - One the BEST videos I've EVER seen on this topic, to which I felt compelled to post: "Make no mistake, 'Feminism' DOES exist in Communist and Authoritarian countries, it is just not CALLED such. Call it 'De Facto Feminism' in the 'East' versus 'De Jure Feminism' in the 'West', the cancer still kills communities." I decided to ask my favourite AI oracle for its opinion, and had this fascinating exchange: https://chatgpt.com/share/671e959b-d71c-800a-b6d3-f1bca633e9c7
Joseph Omega
2024-10-27 18:56:28 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I think BOTH men AND women can live abundant and fulfilling lives as long as they have PURPOSE: For men, that is often a "career" and their children; for women, that is often a "role" and their children. The one COMMON purpose is NOT a coincidence, by evolutionary design. Matings optimize the "spiritual" effect (when complementary purposes align with each other). "Spiritual" is NOT used here as a synonym for "Religious", but as "Motivational Energy".
Joseph Omega
2024-10-27 18:26:16 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - "Flowers" is more often a PROXY for a LOT of "comfort spending", upon which much of modern "Western" economies appear to rely -- minus the men in their lives, MANY women end up suprisingingly POOR savers, while being profoundly ASTUTE shoppers. Very many retailers and contractors depend for their very livelihood (and hence the livelihood of THEIR wives and children) upon the spending habits of unrestrained female consumers.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-27 18:06:54 +0000 UTC@Hyperion - The TRULY bizarre thing to me is that VERY many women (who CALL themselves "Feminists") appear to GENUINELY be suprised and confused as to why men refuse to ally themselves in their "noble cause".
Joseph Omega
2024-10-27 17:53:43 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - True, and even when running the farm and taking on other (ostensibly) "male tasks", they do so more often than not, in FEMININE ways (like emphasizing "nurturing and empathy" and utilizing "soft power"), rather than MASCULINE ways (such as "competitiveness and "stoic resolve" and utilizing "hard power").
Joseph Omega
2024-10-27 17:50:44 +0000 UTC@HR - Well said. "All the world is a classroom, and we are all the teachers of some, and the students of others."
Joseph Omega
2024-10-27 17:38:01 +0000 UTCA response to the lady at 4:40 would be to take a listen at this : Confessions Of Leftover Women In China - A WARNING To Young Women https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eex-2QtX8uM
ATH-YF
2024-10-27 16:34:46 +0000 UTCTrue that. When the student is READY, the teacher will appear.
HR
2024-10-27 16:10:31 +0000 UTCSome of us search too hard, especially when we are younger. Unlike women, who get lonely without a partner, we men can live abundant and fulfilling lives alone. And the best relationships often happen when we aren’t looking. Find your happiness within yourself, and you will live a fulfilling life whatever happens.
Eric Linden
2024-10-27 16:04:48 +0000 UTCIf a man doesn´t need anything from her, why would he actually bother? This is the conundrum that I see here. I guess it depends a bit on what you mean by "need". And of course there is a level of "need" that is just unhealthy. But if you don´t need them at all? It is an issue that I struggle with: I used to really desire female companionship and love and support. But I was never succesfull with it. I guess I was to needy. I´ve changed quite a bit over the years and became much more self-reliant and developed a much stronger character. And indeed I see that women notice me much more and show more interest. The issue is just: I don´t care anymore. Most women I see just seem too much trouble for what it´s worth. Why would I jump through all these hoops and all the demands and drama? I used to be "blinded" by my desires and need for companionship. Now that this has gone down, I see the women around me with much more clarity. And unfortunately I realize that I actually don´t want them in my life.
Hermann
2024-10-27 15:42:05 +0000 UTCSome Souls are really choosing to go down and reach rock bottom for reasons, the influence goes deep into one's past experiences. This is a lesson in Freewill and respect for the life direction a certain amount of consciousness choose that are in the opposite of what other choose. If we don't release the savior complex on our-self (trying to convince the lost causes) it can result of their life path taking down the one of those trying to rescue them from the suffering. 'Taking everyone else down with this fall' is part of the goal actually. That's why many have convinced that the inverted-value reality is the best option and should be adopted as the new norm. (aka fake evolution).
ATH-YF
2024-10-27 15:22:55 +0000 UTCIndeed, Hard truth being spoken when it comes to finding the quality women these days.. The rare ones who sparked my attention were already taken, I was envious for the bf but at the same time wondered what bullet I was dodging by staying single so I observed.. and of course there is no ideal situation it's all about trade off and learning to deal with each other. Celibacy gives you time and space to reflect on the world and its direction, it also give space to discover the purposes of life for both the self and the collective. This is where I found out the sad trap of the human condition over the time cycles, the struggles of reincarnation and hidden solutions to release the patterns experienced by the lack of Romantic Love. You'll be automatically repulsive to toxic peoples by bringing your best and could find yourself quite lonesome if the ppl in the surroundings are more affected. The scary part of this life journey is finding out there is LESS peoples going UPward than going DOWNward in evolution. This observation can also make some people realize than the task down here has been to assist consciousness to break free from it's mass programing and push back the darkness/inversion in this world (while taking measures to protect yourself). The kind of mission that the sacred feminine and sacred masculine can achieve when they manage to meet and assist each other, eventually producing the next gen of spiritual warriors that could carry the DNA to hold this type of positive consciousness legacy.
ATH-YF
2024-10-27 15:12:18 +0000 UTCWomen get tired of buying their own flowers sometime after they hit the wall.
Eric Linden
2024-10-27 14:37:41 +0000 UTCYes. And woe betide any man who attempts to provide them guidance on this reality. These women are all too often their own worst enemy and are beyond help.
MB
2024-10-27 13:16:59 +0000 UTCWhile not all women are blue haired, pierced-out, tatted-all-over, disagreeable, vile tempered, foul-mouthed, entitled, indoctrinated, promiscuous, STD-ridden, self-loathing, strident unfeminine feminists ... the odds of meeting one today in the West is by far more often than not. Christians and conservatives have been trying to help these misguided femmes for decades, and for that they have being endlessly mocked and attacked by the very same feminists they purport to help. Witnessing that, why would any sensible, self-respecting man want to help a feminists who doesn't want to be helped, much less sit silently in front of one for a mere few minutes to "demonstrate masculinity"? Sometimes you just have to call it for what it is: a lost cause.
Hyperion
2024-10-27 10:31:40 +0000 UTCEvolutionary biology dictates that men are masculine and women are feminine. Both are able to switch roles when necessary, like a woman running the farm and taking on other male tasks when her husband dies. But it is not the NATURAL state to take on the opposite role.
Eric Linden
2024-10-27 07:43:46 +0000 UTCMasculinity in men brings out femininity in women. Femininity in women brings out masculinity in men.
Eric Linden
2024-10-27 07:32:25 +0000 UTCSo. In short, for a man, the purpose of his existence is to focus upon being masculine. Men... it's actuality that simple. Just be a man. Take responsibility for yourself. Bravo, Mr. Grace for your elegant, masculine, Zen.
MB
2024-10-27 07:22:11 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - Yup.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-27 07:19:36 +0000 UTCI'm curious as to the meaning when Alexander says: "There's nothing that women find more gross and disgusting than a man who needs something from her." Does that include if a man "needs" (in the sense of EXPECTS) "Femininity" from a woman? If this is so, and the man ELIMINATES this expectation, this would seem to strip women of any accountability for what is expected of them. "When men spend too much time looking at feminine women he gets lost. It activates his own femininity and he loses touch with his own manhood." I'm not sure I agree with the asymmetry of this as a general rule. In the long pre-Feminism past, there were VERY few masculine women, and those were largely quickly ostracized by their peers. As such, most men had NO choice BUT to be masculine, otherwise society would unravel, and women would suffer a lack of protection and guidance. As such, men, exposed to a multitude of feminine women HAD to pull their weight, as there was no one else to do so. Any modern phenomenon of men "activating their own femininity and losing ther manhood" by "spending too much time looking at feminine women" seems a product more of "internalized emasculation", having bought into the Feminist Ideology that they should "discover their feminine side" as some warped sense of "self-development". Here again we run into the failure of the "boat" and "island" analogy as Alexander originally presented it, where "boats would flit from island to island, and it was the SOLE responsibility of the island to PRESENT itself favorably to attract boats". Women, though they may often ACT and even LOOK like them, are NOT children with ZERO responsibilities in the formation of strong and lasting relationships. Men are NOT "dancing bears" (irony not missed), whose sole purpose it is to ENTERTAIN women. This idea is a product of the fairly recent "Troubadour Era" of "Western" culture and, even then, was adequately balanced by the "Courtesan Era" that coexisted with it. Again, we are a DIMORPHIC species evolved over EONS to "entertain" and "energize" each other's complementarities -- masculine AND feminine. A "Troubadour" without the EXPECTATION of "Courtesanship" is, by defintion, a "simp", and a man who pretends that a woman does not COMPLETE him is NAIVE. Likewise (should I even have to spell it out), a "Courtesan" without the EXPECTATION of "Troubadourship" is, by defintion, a FEMALE "simp" (often called a "pick-me"), and a woman who pretends that a man does not COMPLETE her is similarly NAIVE. Homosexuality and other paraphilias excepted.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-27 07:12:16 +0000 UTCWhat young women don’t realize is that they DO need a man to be fulfilled. They just don’t realize it until they are older. When they are older, it is often too late.
Eric Linden
2024-10-27 06:46:35 +0000 UTCmeh 🤷♂️
Peter
2024-10-27 06:31:55 +0000 UTCWhats that 1 compliment worth if you have to endure the constant risk of “eww””gross” “get away creep” Just enough to keep you hungry and available
Peter
2024-10-27 06:16:56 +0000 UTCWomen are complimented constantly. Some men get one compliment a year.
Eric Linden
2024-10-27 05:21:27 +0000 UTC
