PATREON EXCLUSIVE (Full Video): I went undercover on Feminist Reddit and got banned
Added 2024-10-23 02:13:30 +0000 UTC
Comments
No, but I have a friend who’s really big on that subReddit who is on discord server I’m on. She keeps wanting me to join the PPD server but nah… Alexander Grace is enough for me. Plus on principle, I don’t want to use Reddit.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-10-30 22:41:32 +0000 UTCHave you ever been on r/purplepilldebate? It is what it says, a space for people with differing views on modern dating culture, gender roles, etc. It's only lightly moderated, there's a ban on incel or blackpill content, although even that's not consistently enforced.
William
2024-10-30 18:31:46 +0000 UTCYou found the line if you get banned
Saquib S
2024-10-30 11:31:40 +0000 UTCIt may be worth considering that you may have been banned simply because your comment offended Minor Attracted Persons.... Just a thought...
Glenn Moody
2024-10-30 02:00:41 +0000 UTCOne of my favourites!
RhodiumMaiden
2024-10-30 01:03:21 +0000 UTC💯
RhodiumMaiden
2024-10-30 01:02:07 +0000 UTCThanks!
Stanford Matthews
2024-10-29 19:20:44 +0000 UTCI remember a female colleague once telling me she was out with her friends and and after learning what "they are doing to their boyfriends", she is afraid if what they would do to her if she ever angered them. Sounds like something worth recording.But the sad thing? We have enough "evidence" of terrible behaviour. But no one cares and they keep getting away with it.
Hermann
2024-10-28 21:02:02 +0000 UTCI read that feminism's roots are in Marxism. Anything with its roots in Marxism is poisonous to society. Regarding the down voting of your post and the up voting of the original post. My theory is that as women are social creatures and follow the crowd, it's possible yours was down voted simply because the original post was deleted by the moderator and those reading went along with the moderator.
David Anon
2024-10-27 06:58:11 +0000 UTCHoney badgers are if not the most ferocious and bad ass creatures to roam the planet. Funny they call MRA's that ... it's certainly a badge of honor. Watch this. Narration cracks me up every time. Legend. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r7wHMg5Yjg
Hyperion
2024-10-27 03:43:58 +0000 UTCI can’t stand Reddit. Tried it recently and got banned within a week. And I was on my best behaviour! MRA and redpillwomen are decent subs but what I can’t tolerate about Reddit is how nothing interesting is permitted for discussion bc of the insane censorship . You should check out the forbidden topics list for the unpopular opinion sub Reddit. It’s literally everything remotely meaningful ever.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-10-27 03:36:41 +0000 UTCI love honey badgers! 😂
RhodiumMaiden
2024-10-27 03:31:55 +0000 UTCReddit is a like sewer that's on fire. Even the fun subreddits are a dumping ground for trolls. When I spend too much time on Reddit, I remind myself to go outside and touch grass. Please stay positive and above all remember that women are hardwired for survival which means their needs come first.
Eric Andreas
2024-10-26 03:04:24 +0000 UTCDon't let anything on Reddit influence your opinion too much. Half the accounts are probably bots farming for karma. (If you want to see what I mean, look up karma farming by governments and other groups seeking to influence. They build bot accounts that say the accepted things then karma farm to seem legitimate when they want to make statements to influence elections/opinions etc. Also - On reddit all you see is the net balance of up/down votes.)
Devin Forbes
2024-10-25 16:22:26 +0000 UTCYou should make a video where you praise men and underline their good qualities on the sub reddit, then watch the reactions whether its up vote or down vote. Then show the results in another video. That would make the experiment more fair to prove the hypothesis. That's to give the benefit of the doubt that maybe there are feminists that would up vote something nice about men.
Zara Pinto
2024-10-25 15:31:02 +0000 UTCWe really need to talk about Alexander’s masterful hateful woman writing lol
Christopher
2024-10-25 13:39:52 +0000 UTCWelcome man!
Christopher
2024-10-25 13:39:19 +0000 UTCJust joining the Patreon. The shortened version of this video on YouTube really piqued my interest. Was well worth the price of admission as well 👍.
Stanford Matthews
2024-10-25 12:44:21 +0000 UTCI am 59, I wont date anyone with a TIKTOK account (as Brian Atlas says, 'TIKTOK brain' is a thing). I wont date single moms either ( my kids are grown, not looking to be a stepdad). So it looks like Im gunna be single for the rest of my life. In the meantime, I am tending to my friends and my hobbies. I have some pretty expensived hobbies so adding a girlfriend in there will only had to the expense!!
John McGuinness
2024-10-25 12:26:23 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - In the end, Cultural Feminism seems to represent a VERY credible candidate for a Fifth (and hopefully FINAL) Wave of Feminism: https://chatgpt.com/share/671b25b8-8fb4-800a-ae74-c87470dda7f5 "In some ways, Cultural Feminism may actually be MORE radical than Hard Power Feminism, because it challenges not just the patriarchal structures but the very foundations of what society considers power. By redefining power in feminine terms, it seeks to transform society’s value system from within, rather than just challenging it externally." I'd buy THAT for a dollar! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85cL1HisrNc
Joseph Omega
2024-10-25 05:04:53 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega - I agree. Interesting. It's like debating the younger version of yourself.
Eric Linden
2024-10-25 03:18:22 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - Wow. I see a rather CLEAR difference between YOUR version 3.5 response and MY version 4o response. I queried MY version of ChatGPT on this very topic a bit more, and updated and refreshed the very same link. Check it out. Ironically, it seems as if the movement (in the "West") has "transitioned", and now IDENTIFIES as Radical Feminism. 🤣 Your version seems significantly more "woke" than mine.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-25 02:43:12 +0000 UTC@joseph that is a question i have to ponder. “All” prefences. That would be cheeky to claim… I shall think about which cases are acceptable and which are not. To find a sort of general rule for me. Since there could be my my personal definition Taking a attridute a a descriminant (in the mathematics sense) like that could be positive or negative. Like have the number 3 as your descrimination and value about or below. We could have “kindism” “menschism” “empatheticism” Aka preference for good attributes. But i think the point you mentioned. The treating a negative preference with targeted malice is a no go. Especially if its an immutable attribute and triply if its a positive character attribute like kindness or respect or trust
Peter
2024-10-25 02:10:19 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega - That goes along with my thinking. Basically I am just saying the definition evolves over time. I did my own Chat GPT: https://chatgpt.com/share/671af070-e49c-800d-84cd-b44705df037f Summary of Changes 1994: Focus on celebrating women's differences from men, with an emphasis on nurturing and caregiving. Essentialist views of femininity were common but increasingly challenged. 2004: Incorporation of intersectionality and a more complex understanding of femininity. Emphasis on the diversity of women’s experiences across different cultural and social backgrounds. 2014: Expanded to celebrate diverse expressions of femininity, including emotional resilience, body positivity, and the impact of digital feminism. Strong focus on global and intersectional perspectives. In each decade, Cultural Feminism retained its core focus on the value of traditionally feminine traits, but the understanding of those traits and the ways they were framed evolved alongside the broader feminist movement.
Eric Linden
2024-10-25 01:16:06 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I (again) decided to ask ChatGPT for a clarification -- from what it responded, I don't really see that much fundamental differences between the varying flavors of Cultural Feminism: https://chatgpt.com/share/671adb18-6270-800a-9c15-caf14f7a5bcf In keeping with the "culinary metaphor", the following is how Anthropic's Claude AI explained it - Think of it like a recipe that has the same basic ingredients but is prepared very differently in each kitchen: - The "ingredients" (recognition of feminine perspective, valuation of women's experiences) remain - The "preparation method" (how these are understood and implemented) varies significantly - The "final dish" (what Cultural Feminism looks like in practice) can be dramatically different This variation isn't just theoretical - it has practical implications. For example: - Western Cultural Feminism might focus on workplace culture transformation - Islamic Cultural Feminism might focus on reinterpreting religious texts - African Cultural Feminism might emphasize community-based leadership models On the trolling aspect: Yes, I am indeed familiar with Alexander's experiment, but that was before I ever signed up for his Patreon. Now I have access to the extended version of her response, and just watched it in its entirety: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwhbdvc4soI It IS interesting, and I continue to be amazed at women's cluelessness of the male experience. How could they be SO unaware of their OWN behavior? I think Alexander should have asked her THAT question -- she does not appear to be either a ditzy or inconsiderate woman. Is Hypergamy SOOO ingrained in their psyche that they are COMPLETELY unaware of its effects? Perhaps the positive responses from Brazilians reflects some sort of race, ethnicity or location component of the Hypergamy psychology a la Wheat Waffles' SMV Calculator: https://youtu.be/kZqNkkX7oeE?t=679
Joseph Omega
2024-10-24 23:47:57 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega - The terms cultural masculinity, cultural femininity, cultural feminism, and cultural Christianity are all defined by the culture at the time. Whatever the culture as a whole believes about feminism today is "cultural feminism." In a year, that could be exactly the same or vastly different. We don't know. It's a very confusing term. As for the Reddit forum, I agree with you. Although interesting, I don't find it accurate or conclusive about what the average woman or the average feminist believes. I do like trolling though, and I've done it a little myself. And Alexander's most viewed video was his female friend trolling using his photos on a dating site. That one was very interesting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZTIbHIsIYw&t=9s
Eric Linden
2024-10-24 21:50:49 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - interesting. How would you differentiate between your understanding of the interpretations of "Cultural Feminism" (as ChatGPT has defined it) from 2014 to 2024 to a possible 2034 meaning? Also, in summary, though I would tend to agree with Alexander's premise that Feminism is, by is very modern foundations, an intensely noxious, divisive and inherently misandric ideology, I cannot necessarily agree that the exchanges he had on the Reddit forum to be particularly illustrative of its true toxicity -- the NET votes he received fall FAR short of that which I had initially feared from listening to many an overtly man-hating podcast that I have been invited recently to observe.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-24 20:43:24 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega - I'm agreeing with ChatGPT on this. The article I read originally obviously has flaws and was biased. In the media we have today, we all have to be open to changing our minds, as most news is written with a slant one way or the other. Regarding #1-#11, I agree with your take on all of them. I would only add that in #3, where you reference "cultural feminism," it should be noted that that term is used to represent the time we live in. Cultural feminism in 2014 is not the same as it is in 2024. And the term will mean something different in 2034. It represents the way things are at the time you speak it.
Eric Linden
2024-10-24 20:11:38 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I updated the very same link to include an expanded discussion incorporating the article you supplied as well as its references. ChatGPT's original estimates appear to be still suprisingly consistent. Note the important apples-to-apples historical analysis at the end. Although we have been focusing on #12, I would be interested to hear your opinion on my other 11 points.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-24 18:31:44 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega - I found this that I read long ago: https://go2tutors.com/teachers-more-likely-abuse-kids/ ChatGPT disagrees I guess.
Eric Linden
2024-10-24 14:44:02 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I can certainly see at least TWO reasons for boys not to report this, but I get a little trouble imagining the ACTUAL motivation for a female teacher -- female desperation of this magnitude seems such an alien concept to me.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-24 05:47:31 +0000 UTC@Peter - I'm a dog person myself, but I don't consider them inherently SUPERIOR beings to cats. But even if I did, I would scarcely be compelled to KICK the next cat I came across. Racism and sexism are not INHERENTLY evil, just profoundly misguided -- usually born of deep ignorance -- and for many, indeed a thin line for when it steps over into evil: When you OPPRESS based on this "perception of superiority". For example, though I tend to have a visceral reaction to pedophiles, I can't bring myself to consider them an INFERIOR form of human. Do you consider ALL discrimination and preferences to be evil? Maybe this IS all semantics, and we are really on the same page.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-24 05:33:54 +0000 UTCIm not sure I understand the rational. If you have a preference for something, is it not implied you find it better, which is but a stones throw from “ superior”, if not in effect a synonym their of And vice versa. If you think something to be superior you will probably have a preference for the better compared to a inferior item. At most charitable i see that as sort of seeing it as different sides of the same coin Furthermore i wonder if splitting hairs about which is worse on the heiarchy of evil is somehow being apologetic to the things you hve deemed “mere a prevence” If thats a general consensus or your personal interpretation i cant tell. I am speaking to my personal understanding of the words. I cant claim in good conscience knowledge of their general use. I don’t always agree with dictationary definitions either.
Peter
2024-10-24 04:29:06 +0000 UTC@Peter - Well, not all "-isms" are created equal: Some (like racism, sexism, ageism, etc.) pertain to, not preference for, but the perception of one group being inherently superior/inferior to the other; others (like elitism, narcissism, Feminism, nationalism, socialism, etc.) ARE strictly preferential. I personally have no problem with "descrimination" per se, as the word inherently simply represents "preferences" -- we all need to descriminate between things in order to choose from among alternatives (like blondes over redheads or cake over pie or Apple over Android). I think the problem occurs when the preferences are used to create, support or justify "oppression" in some way. Nationalism can become oppressive when considering the ill treatment of immigrants; elitism can become oppressive when considering the ill treatment of the poor; narcissism can become oppressive when considering the ill treatment of other's feelings. So too, I imagine, Feminism only became oppressive when it begain considering the ill treatment of men in retaliation for a "historically oppressive Patriarchy". It lost its way when it stopped simply protecting women (and children) from physical harm, and engaged in retribution.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-24 03:24:11 +0000 UTC@Joseph Omega - Very interesting. These are reported numbers, which is the best we can do. It is next to impossible to know the real numbers. Due to the social contagion factor, the "bad name" Catholic Priests have would make it more likely that there would be false allegations. For example, when stars like Bill Cosby or Michael Jackson are accused of something, suddenly many more accusers come forward, a good number of which I believe are lying. As for female teachers, I am sure the numbers are much higher. Boys rarely report it. I sure wouldn't have.
Eric Linden
2024-10-24 03:10:53 +0000 UTCFirst problem: You went to Reddit. Second problem: Let em burn.
Bill Washinski
2024-10-24 02:53:25 +0000 UTC@Louis - ... (which is insulting) and percieved to be resilient (which is complimentary).
Joseph Omega
2024-10-24 02:38:56 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - Well, even MODERN men still DO possess a spark of a sense of "masculine honor" that can be challenged, if only by their peers -- women do not have a similar constraint.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-24 02:37:25 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - Interesting: Here is ChatGPT's response that features spcific URL references: https://chatgpt.com/share/6719afa4-ea38-800a-a25a-6bc3f6b7711d It would've seemed logical to expect these rates to be somewhat proportional in some way to the degree of sexual repression inherent in the profession.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-24 02:28:07 +0000 UTCRegarding Catholic Priests, they are a scapegoat of the left and have been for a couple decades. If you get the actual numbers, there are more pedophiles among woke Protestant ministers and Muslim clergy, even more among male school teachers, and even more among female school teachers.
Eric Linden
2024-10-24 00:46:26 +0000 UTCWith the availability of wireless Ring cameras, it's surprising we haven't seen more videos of men secretly recording groups of women saying sexist things about men. We see videos of women secretly recording their husbands and boyfriends all the time.
Eric Linden
2024-10-24 00:35:32 +0000 UTCI'm not surprised. Reddit is extremely censored these days. They give perma ban like candies. And especially if you hover into gender opinions.
Louis
2024-10-24 00:28:58 +0000 UTCThis is the most degrading part of his experiment. Pitty will always go toward women NEVER toward men as always because men are expendable.
Louis
2024-10-24 00:18:51 +0000 UTCI have a few observations that I think we may all have to face -- simply my opinions: 1) Men are not "pedophiles", but many DO tend to be "ephebophiles" -- there IS a difference, but not one that highly emotional and reactive women may easily discern. https://chatgpt.com/share/67195d7b-87f8-800a-85a6-e9bf2fcb0362 Not the "sexualization of TEENAGERS" as much as the "sexualization of YOUNG WOMEN" -- with the LAW determining the official dividing line. If the "teenager" does NOT look like a "young woman", then the attraction is, by definition, PEDOPHILIC instead. BTW, many women DO tend to be "plutophiles" (lovers of wealth), rather than "chrematophiles" (lovers of money). All Greek to me anyway. 😅 2) Men DO derive an ego-boost from the successful application of "hard-power", just as women derive an ego-boost from the successful application of "soft-power" (see "Fifty Shades of Gray" and other popular tales in the "Romance Genre""). 3) Google is not really lying: Feminism IS about "women gaining full equality with men", but only with respect to "hard power". With respect to "soft power", women have LITTLE desire to share such power with men, assuming that such a development was even feasible. In addition, it is not universally about the "HATRED of men", but about the "JEALOUSY of men" and the high-profile benefits of "hard power" as well as the almost complete LACK of respect and belittling of the low-profile benefits of "soft power". In other words, it is IRONICALLY an ideology based upon the exaltation of the so-called "Patriarchal Ideals" that they decry -- MAINSTREAM Feminism has yet to mature sufficiently to discover their OWN value systems INDEPENDENT of what males have established for themselves. There DOES exist a lesser variant called "Cultural Feminism" which "argues that rather than seeking equality by competing with men in traditionally masculine domains, women should embrace and promote the value of feminine strengths. This approach seeks to overturn patriarchal values by showing that traits historically associated with women are equally valuable, if not more so, for creating a just and harmonious society." Also, I have REPEATEDLY cautioned against the CASUAL use of the word "equal" which almost EVERYONE equates with "the same" or "interchangeable", despite their insistence they don't really mean that. 4) The numerical results associated with Reddit comments only represent the NET count of the difference between total "upvotes" and total "downvotes", so that a value of, say 50, COULD represent 5,050 upvotes and 5,000 downvotes. Also even 50 raw upvotes out of 14 MILLION subscribers seems not worth mentioning as having much significance (especially as only the MOST PASSIONATE -- often read "nut-jobs" -- of ANY subscribers ever feel compelled to vote on ANY forum). 5) Joe Rogan has already been labeled by the MSM as a "right-wing misogynist" (like Jordan Peterson), and MOST people tend to be either "Sheeple" (accepting of EVERYTHING said by the mass media) or "Scattle" (automatically rejecting of ANYTHING said by the mass media), and so never need to READ the ACTUAL sources of their disdain. These facts coupled with the well-known susceptibility of women to "social contagions" would lead the average woman to automatically conclude that "men who watch Joe Rogan are toxic", sight unseen. 6) Femininity is actively looked down upon by mainstream Feminism as part of the "Patriarchal value system" (or "conservative"), so that it would make sense that even CASUAL "progressive" members of the "sisterhood" would be tempted to suspect any man seeking this attribute in women as being "part of the problem", without even needing to question the reasoning -- watching the "Barbie" movie is probably sufficient. 7) It has been explained to me numerous times by MANY women that a "nice" man is unattractive to women. Here are LITERAL quotes from a woman on THIS Patreon: "I'm not attracted to nice men ... What a turn off" and "The problem with nice men is they're boring and sorry to say this spineless". There were quite a few female corroborations. Even Alexander himself featured a video that hinted at this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkFF_zL2oq8 8) In a relative sense, men INDEED tend to have "fragile egos" but "tough exteriors", while women tend to have "tough egos" (often born of near perpetual cultural flattery) but "fragile exteriors". So the accusation by women that men are "such babies", and the observation that they "need applause and celebrations" seems perfectly understandable from their over-inflated position, born as they are (as all "10's") at the "top of the hill", and never needing such EXTRA reassurances. 9) The very ubiquitous penetrative aspect of normal human sexual intercourse (even among homosexuals) suggests that the "male" in the relationship enjoys the "hard power over them" when "a 'woman' is naked and vulnerable". But I imagine the "female" in the relationship enjoys the "soft power over them" when they can AROUSE and involuntarily CAPTIVATE a man when "she" is "naked and vulnerable". 10) "Most men you meet (on dating apps) are absolutely not safe to interact with." There IS of course the 95% of men, either OFF the dating apps or is NOT "met" (meaning INVISIBLE) likely ARE safe to interact with. The 5% "met" have been socially BRED to be JERKS. Just another instance of the well known "hypergamous blindness." 11) I imagine that VERY MANY of the "strippers" who willingly choose this profession enjoy the "soft power" they exert over men such that they are willing to part with their hard-earned money. As for women "degrading themselves all the way to bank", well OnlyFans certainly suggests an alternate social dynamic, so "Fuck off" appears an understandable response in such circumstances. It IS about sex AND about power. Duh-uh. 12) There IS the well-documented instances of GENUINE "pedophiles" (not merely "ephebophiles") among Catholic Priests (who ARE all male) but, like Alexander, I'm AGNOSTIC, so I can't really relate to this curious profession and its "forced celibacy" edicts -- I have my suspicions as to the psychology of someone drawn to that lifestyle in the FIRST place, that I will keep to myself. Still, the argument against "Bioessentialism" seemingly ONLY because it is "harmful towards trans, NB, and gender non-conforming people" (but NOT men) IS pathetic, and illustrates how far devout Feminists will go to support their "Cognitive Dissonance-laced" ideology. Here is an unusually long exchange I held with ChatGPT on this whole topic: https://chatgpt.com/share/6719783d-8b94-800a-af66-6307d8767f69 As usual, you can skip to the very end to get to the important conclusion.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-23 22:37:09 +0000 UTC@castirondude - True, it could just be the crazies who chose to respond. Most women may not care all that much to have such a strong opinion one way or the other. 💁♂️
Joseph Omega
2024-10-23 19:40:16 +0000 UTCI'm not convinced that these numbers constitute the "upvotes" that I think Alexander interprets: https://chatgpt.com/share/67194f48-0a4c-800a-a0d9-d443fcdaeda6 There appears no real way to know just how many raw "upvotes" there were, only the DIFFERENCES between "upvotes" and "downvotes". Also, I must say that I was TRULY impressed with the authenticity of Alexander's comments -- they were as authentically emotional as we've all experienced, and that I'm sure women themselves are accustomed to saying amongst themselves. I'm actually surprised that he eventually got banned.
Joseph Omega
2024-10-23 19:36:32 +0000 UTCNo simps in sight
Peter
2024-10-23 18:07:01 +0000 UTCYeah! Wait what?
Peter
2024-10-23 18:04:48 +0000 UTCOnce I had a houshold of 5 household duty planning session. I always wandered why I felt uncomfortable about this topic. I found out, I didn't actually know what I wanted and was important for me. Figuring that out was quite a step forward. Reaviling was, we had mud accumulation on the entry path. I suggested removing the mud shoud be part of the household plan. Guess what the answer was ... They were not responsible for my hobbies.
Michael Rumpelt
2024-10-23 11:04:28 +0000 UTCMan this should go public
Mohammed Nabih
2024-10-23 09:21:57 +0000 UTCThe truth shall set you free..." “The truth will set you free” is a common saying in academic circles that want to promote academic freedom and the power of learning."
Daniel L Chin
2024-10-23 08:25:22 +0000 UTCGreat experiment! Really telling.
Olivier
2024-10-23 07:09:08 +0000 UTCThat is a great way to test / proove a young mind with actions vs words, I like this concept as much as your video of dating apps switching profiles, please keep coming up with this core ideas Alexander!
Jimmy Madrigal
2024-10-23 04:52:34 +0000 UTC*MEN* also fail to step up for men's issues though. Well you do of course but in general. Women stand up for women's issues. Men stand up for women's issues. But neither men or women stand up for men's issues. With my wife I negotiate. It's happened to me on many occasions that I was out doing a really tough awful job in the blistering heat, and then when I come home she's in an air conditioned house, gets in my face about some minor issue like the counter is cluttered or someone spilled some juice. -- "Okay, fine, if you want me to do housekeeping that's ok. You go put a new water pump on the van". "Oh that's really heavy you know I can't do that". " Well I don't see you trying" "That's a man's job" "Well then, if I need to do 100% of a man's job then you do 100% of a woman's job" If your wife/girlfriend , or really any woman in your life treats you poorly, stand up for yourself.
castirondude
2024-10-23 04:47:32 +0000 UTCGranted women also gaslight each other, including giving each other bad advice to send the competition into the weeds.
castirondude
2024-10-23 04:37:02 +0000 UTCYea. <100 upvotes on a forum with millions of users is not a high percentage. It could well be that the majority of women who saw that decided to tiptoe around the toxic mess.
castirondude
2024-10-23 04:35:08 +0000 UTCMen know this. Not all can prove it but they all know it. Women are playing a very dangerous game because there will be a time when men have had enough and things will turn ugly. Look up whatifalthist's video on youtube about the German Weimar period. It has a lot of parallels to today and had devastating consequences.
castirondude
2024-10-23 04:25:37 +0000 UTCAlso, women don't care about men's struggles. Never have and never will. It's just not in their nature. Honey badgers (MRAs) are by far the exception, not the norm. The most empowering thing a man can do is to chase excellence and prioritize his own purpose. Treat women as amusing distractions. A truly powerful man is not one who seeks power or control over women, but one that can not be manipulated.
Hyperion
2024-10-23 03:35:32 +0000 UTCI used to think that women are all sugar, spice, and everything nice when I was young, naïve, and stupid. Learned quickly that women are "kind, gentle, and nice" only when their hypergamy are satisfied. It's both disappointing and disturbing how little compassion and empathy women have for the stereotypical male. At best women are apathetic to the struggles of men, at worst, they treat perceived lesser males with contempt and disdain. The giant red pill can be administered orally or rectally. To avoid the latter, learn it early and make peace with it.
Hyperion
2024-10-23 03:24:19 +0000 UTCBravo Man! Just Bravo! MIC DROP!
MarkGauci85
2024-10-23 03:18:22 +0000 UTCNot conforming to the sisterhood, well actually going against, the group, is not human nature. If enough people say 2+2=5 (they did a test in class I believe) then a lot of times the test subjects would go along with the group even if they know its wrong. Feminist have that advantage. And its rare to find a woman to acknowledge any of thw points made by alex or me. Even though i honestly don’t know how you can’t. I guess not „openly agreeing“ but withholding comment. It as good as it often gets. Lest you be a parahia and shamed with terms like „pick me“
Peter
2024-10-23 03:04:29 +0000 UTCI went on reddit too . On „ask finimists“ ( i remember you saying you did too once). I guess they didnt like my questions, i was banned within a week 😝. And a went on with a genuine desire to learn and have my mind changed. In that process you obviously have to defend you stance somewhere that the counter arguments have enough rigour… ahh well Edit : the reason given was. The positive representation of prostitution. Coz there they said prostitution as a whole has a lot of exploitation and organised criminal elements. I agree but asking „ if a so claimed desperate MALE NEED for sex exists, wouldn’t it theoretically be sense to have a safe regulated fairly paid outlet for that“ but i know they were itching to ban me anyway. They just needed a technicality. I can still read the forum, just not post. This vid make me wanna check it pur again, aince i havnt look at the topics… since corona, yeah a while ago
Peter
2024-10-23 02:40:18 +0000 UTCI never considered myself feminist. Even in my simpiest of simp days…. And now even less so If its about equality then why not call it „equality“ my use an „ism“ where every other „ism“ means exactly as you said the preference for a particular atteibute be it race , racism, elite, elitism, sex, sexist, nation, nationalist, etc etc abd NONE of them are good. So why feminist suddenly is the only good one? And any slogan needing so lich context to make it understood is a bad slogan anyway. Cant have a slogan „free ketchup on pizza „ and actually meant „ free beer with roast chicken „ These days im for equality and against feminism or any other form of descrimination. On principle.
Peter
2024-10-23 02:35:51 +0000 UTC
